Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garone-Nicksich Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$147k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$217kAnimals$173kFood & Nutrition$120kHuman Services$98kYouth Development$97kHealth$85kArts & Culture$71kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CSU PUEBLO FOUNDATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
PUEBLO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$20,000
FRIENDS OF PUEBLO ANIMAL SHELTER$11,500
CARE & SHARE FOOD BANK$10,000
PAWS FOR LIFE$10,000
YMCA OF PUEBLO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE: $20k → 15%SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$709k · 17 repeat orgs$339k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$709k
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-28%

Still filing today

29%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionAnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Care and Share Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +15%
  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +49%
  • PZ
    PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $78k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF PUEBLO
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • PS
    PUEBLO SCHOOL DISTRICT 70
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • PL
    PUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICT
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pueblo Primary Care Qalicb

To support pueblo community health center.

Health
2
Pueblo Economic Development Corporation

Our mission is to attract, retain, and expand primary jobs for the Pueblo community.

—
3
Pueblo Symphony Association Inc

To bring musical artists together to perform concerts for the citizens of the city and county of pueblo.

Arts & Culture
4
Pueblo Library Foundation

The organization is organized to perform functions of or to carryout the purposes of the Pueblo City-County Library District including providing resources for development maintenance and operation of the Pueblo City-County Library District…

Philanthropy
5
Pueblo Critico Inc
Education
6
Pueblo Community Health Center Foundation Inc

Fundraising and financial assistance to pueblo community health center

Health
7
Paso del Norte Community Foundation

PdNCF supports the philanthropic goals of individuals, families, corporations, foundations and nonprofit organizations to improve education, health, social services, economic development, and quality of life in the Paso del Norte region.

Health
8
Nature and Raptor Center of Pueblo

The agency is a conservation Center near Pueblo, CO, where land and people can provide unique experiences in education, conservation and recreation that inspire responsible environmental stewardship.

—
9
Pueblo Hispanic Education Foundation

Provides scholarships for higher education.

Education
10
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc

Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…

Health
11
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
12
Pueblo Unido Cdc

To address the needs and problems of distressed rural communities through a strategic plan to utilize existing resources and create new opportunities with the collaboration of community members to achieve social change.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pueblo Community College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Trees Please Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUEBLO BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $85,000 · OtherPUEBLO BOYS & GIRLS CLUBSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS CTR: $61,200 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS CTRIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYMCA OF PUEBLO: $50,000 · OtherYMCA OF PUEBLOCITY OF PUEBLO: $50,000 · OtherCITY OF PUEBLOPUEBLO SCHOOL DISTRICT 70: $45,000 · OtherPUEBLO SCHOOL DISTRICT 70PUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICT: $40,000 · OtherPUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICTPUEBLO FOOD PROJECT: $40,000 · OtherPUEBLO FOOD PROJECTWET MTN WILDLIFE REHAB: $35,000 · OtherSRDA: $30,000 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE: $25,000 · OtherSO COLO COMMUITY CARE: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $176,000 · Other+17 moreCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationCOLORADO S…PUEBLO SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $10,000 · EducationPUEBLO SCH…Pueblo Community College Foundation: $5,000 · EducationCare and Share Inc: $80,000 · Food & NutritionPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $78,000 · AnimalsSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $40,000 · Human ServicesPOSADA: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSHIELD 616 INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalTREES PLEASE INC: $7,500 · Environment
Other$717,200Education$95,000Food & Nutrition$80,000Animals$78,000Human Services$40,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Crime & Legal$10,000Environment$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCare and Share Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $78,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOSADA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUEBLO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPueblo Community College Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEDCO FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds POSADA ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
  • Who funds TREES PLEASE INC ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PEDCO FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert Hoag Rawlings FoundationCO26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · The Bob and Doris Johnston Foundation · Southern Colorado Community Foundat · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · Frank I Lamb Foundation · Ryals Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Ent Credit Union · Daniels Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garone-Nicksich Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garone-Nicksich Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Garone-Nicksich Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Garone-Nicksich Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garone-Nicksich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph