Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garfield Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$152kEducation$133kHousing & Shelter$103kReligion$83kHuman Services$74kCivil Rights$48kPhilanthropy$29kHealth$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS$40,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$28,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$10,000
THE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM$10,000
SCRIPPS HEALTH$10,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY (CLAYMAN INS$10,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$5,575
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE (ADL)$5,000
MINDSMATTER$5,000
MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO$4,650
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION (UJF)$3,800
FOUNDATION FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY LIBRARIES (SMCL)$2,500
SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE$2,500
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO$2,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$1,490
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAVE MORE KIDS: $263 → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $28k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18k → 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 24 repeat orgs$193k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
20

Total granted

$392k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $96k · revenue +42%
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO
    3× · 2021–2024 · $61k · revenue +98%
  • OG
    OLD GLOBE THEATRE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SM
    SD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
    one grant, 2021 · $90k
  • TA
    THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2023 · $26k · revenue +13%
  • HO
    HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
7
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation

To support and further the research, education and community service objectives of san diego state university.

Education
8
San Diego Society of Natural History

Conserving nature through science and discovery.

Arts & Culture
9
Associated Students of San Diego State University

To support the social, recreational, cultural and education programs and facilities, both on campus and in the community, and to advocate for student interests, provide leadership opportunities and participate in shared governance.

—
10
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
11
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Webb Norden Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $90,000 · OtherSD MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ARTCONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL: $44,472 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ISRAELTHE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND PROGRESSIVE JUDAISM: $40,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MOVEMENT FOR REFORM AND PRO…UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION (UJF): $27,200 · OtherUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION (UJF)TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD: $23,645 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOODHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 · Other+32 more: $84,400 · Other+32 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUST…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $10,550 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUND…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationA COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS: $96,183 · Housing & ShelterA COMMUNITY OF …JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $61,250 · Human ServicesJEWISH COM…+2 more: $1,263 · Human ServicesTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $26,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATER &…OLD GLOBE THEATRE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureOLD GLOBE…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO: $9,650 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF…THE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMINDS MATTER OF NYC INC: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCRIPPS HEALTH: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,500 · Health
Other$324,717Education$111,550Housing & Shelter$96,183Human Services$62,513Arts & Culture$58,150Youth Development$21,500Health$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS: $96,183 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $61,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE: $26,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLD GLOBE THEATRE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF NYC INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $10,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO: $9,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY LIBRARIES: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPanta Pride Foundation Inc: $263 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds THEATER & ARTS FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY DBA LA JOLLA PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OLD GLOBE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER OF NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY LIBRARIES ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA ↗
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Arthur & Barbara Bloom FoundationCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Arthur & Barbara Bloom Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Karney Flaster Family Foundation · Allison and Robert Price Family Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garfield Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garfield Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Garfield Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Garfield Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garfield Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph