· Private foundation
Ganlee Fund
Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k52 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $152k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND (GS VAN HEERDEN FUND) | $921,814 |
| FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND (C VAN HEERDEN FAMILY FUND) | $921,814 |
| HISTORIC SOTTERLEY INC | $100,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC | $52,000 |
| HISTORIC SOTTERLEY INC | $10,000 |
| HISTORIC SOTTERLEY INC | $10,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY LAND TR | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ACADIA | $5,000 |
| COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC | $5,000 |
| MOEGYO HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| MOUNT DESERT LAND & DESERT PERSERVE | $2,500 |
| SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADAIA NATIONAL PARK | $2,000 |
| THE WENDELL GILLEY MUSEUM OF BIRD CARVING | $2,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE CLUB | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHISTORIC SOTTERLEY INC3× · 2017–2019 · $161k · revenue +65%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +2%
- FOFriends of Acadia3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- MFMaine Farmland Trustgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +134%
- OCOCEAN CONSERVANCYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $150 · revenue +97%
- AWAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $150 · revenue +54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
To enable understanding and forecasting of the impacts of climate change, land-use change, and invasive species on continental-scale ecology by providing support for infrastructure and consistent methodologies to support research and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is International Partners in Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HISTORIC SOTTERLEY INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE MID-HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
- Who funds SCHOODIC INSTITUTE AT ACADIA NATIONAL PARK ↗
- Who funds WENDELL GILLEY MUSEUM OF BIRD CARVING ↗
- Who funds Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF HANCOCK COUNT ↗
- Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE CLUB ↗
- Who funds ACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Maine Center for Coastal Fisheries ↗
- Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
- Who funds JESUP MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Yoga Gives Back ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION ↗
- Who funds PATUXENT TIDEWATER LAND TR ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds Acadia Family Center ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE SANCTUARY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds Abbe Museum ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE VOLUNTEERS OF HANCOCK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Colket Family Foundation · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · Florence V Burden Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Nature Conservancy · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Janet Stone Jones Foundation · The Medway Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ganlee Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Rock Creek Conservancy Inc — 60% of income from government
- Historic Sotterley Inc — 28% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ganlee Fund?
Find your warmest path to Ganlee Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.