Skip to content

· Public charity

Gainesville Council on Aging Inc

To assist, encourage and promote the well being of aging individuals, regardless of race, color or creed, through any one of the following means the care and assistance of the sick, needy and disabled, including the operation of health care facilities, the promotion of public health and recreation, the advancement of education and…

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$90kEducation$60kPublic Benefit$40kEmployment$32kHealth$27kReligion$20kYouth Development$19kHousing & Shelter$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIRCLE OF HOPE$90,000
THE ASCENT$77,508
YOUTH AVIATION ADVENTURE$13,000
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
FRANKLINTON RISING$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CIRCLE OF HOPE: $90k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 4 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$128k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+22%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 4D
    40 DAYS FOR LIFE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $60k · revenue -9%
  • FR
    Franklinton Rising
    4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +75%
  • YA
    YOUTH AVIATION ADVENTURE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue -37%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHASE MOVEMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • CH
    CHESED HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +22%
  • CP
    Crisis Pregnancy Center of Gainesville Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope for Life Inc

Crisis pregnancy center assisting women and men dealing with an unexpected pregnancy before and after birth.

—
2
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Services to troubled pregnant mothers

Human Services
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center

Counseling and related support services for pregnant women.

Health
4
National Life Center Inc

Services to pregnant women

—
5
Life Choices Inc

Crisis pregnancy intervention

—
6
Helping Hands Pregnancy & Parenting Center Inc

Helping Hands Pregnancy and Parenting Center is a non-profit Christian ministry offering life-affirming alternatives to abortion through compassionate support and practical education.

Human Services
7
Choices of the Heart Pregnancy Counseling Center Inc

Providing free pregnancy testing and free counseling for individuals walking through unplanned pregnancies.

—
8
Center for Pregnancy Choices Metro Area

The organization's mission is to honor god's standard of the sanctity of human life by empowering women facing unplanned pregnancies to choose life.

Health
9
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Ny Inc

Assistance to women dealing with problems associated with pregnancy.

Health
10
Compassion & Hope Pregnancy Center

To serve families in crisis pregnancies

Human Services
11
Hope for Life Pregnancy Center of Charles City Iowa

Hope for life pregnancy center is a christ-centered, pro-life ministry, committed to sharing the good news of jesus christ and upholding the sanctity of life by providing compassionate, life-affirming services to women, men, and families…

Human Services
12
Choosing Life Pregnancy Resource Center

Educate and provide services for community members who find themselves in a pregnancy situation.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 40 Days for Life; the most unlike its peers is Franklinton Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ASCENT: $77,508 · OtherTHE ASCENTCHASE MOVEMENT: $39,500 · OtherCHASE MOVEMENTCARING CHOICES PREGNANCY HELP COMMUNITYINC: $16,500 · OtherCARING CHOICES PREGNANCY HELP COMMUNITYINCST PATRICKS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST PATRICKS CATHOLIC CHURCHCIRCLE OF HOPE - GAINESVILLE FL: $90,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE OF HOPE - GAINESVILL…40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $60,000 · Education40 DAYS FOR LIFEFranklinton Rising: $32,250 · Housing & ShelterFranklint…YOUTH AVIATION ADVENTURE: $19,250 · Youth DevelopmentPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHESED HOUSE INC: $12,500 · ReligionCrisis Pregnancy Center of Gainesville Inc: $10,000 · Health
Other$143,508Human Services$90,000Education$60,000Housing & Shelter$32,250Youth Development$29,250Religion$12,500Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE - GAINESVILLE FL: $90,000 over 1y, 86% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFranklinton Rising: $32,250 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCARING CHOICES PREGNANCY HELP COMMUNITYINC: $16,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCHESED HOUSE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetCrisis Pregnancy Center of Gainesville Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gainesville Council on Aging Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gainesville Council on Aging Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gainesville Council on Aging Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gainesville Council on Aging Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gainesville Council on Aging’s filings →

    More from the funding graph