Skip to content
G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$8kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$650Philanthropy$525Animals$500Recreation & Sports$200International$100
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGURE OF CONEJO VALLEY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 11%RIDE ON: $5k → 14%AMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS: $1k → 6%HIDDEN HARVEST: $250 → 11%RIDE ON: $300 → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $250 → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGURE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $1k → 10%HIDDEN HARVEST: $206 → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGURE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $451 → 10%HIDDEN HARVEST: $200 → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGURE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13k · 5 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +88% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$13k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+26%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    RIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +359%
  • HH
    HIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +8%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +209%
  • SC
    SHERWOOD CARES
    one grant, 2017 · $520
  • CA
    Canine Adoption and Rescue League
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
3
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
6
Emanate Health Hospice

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Human Services
7
Memorial Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

—
8
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
9
Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
10
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
11
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
12
American Health Care Association

Improving lives by delivering solutions for quality care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $5,300 · Human ServicesRIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIPHIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATION: $1,906 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATIONASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $1,671 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEYAMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS INCFEEDING AMERICA: $2,300 · OtherFEEDING AMERICASHERWOOD CARES: $520 · OtherSHERWOOD CARESFit 4 The Cause INC: $100 · Other+1 more: $40 · OtherFeeding America: $1,400 · Food & NutritionFeeding A…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $250 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthHELPHOPELIVE INC: $100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · HealthPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $525 · PhilanthropyCanine Adoption and Rescue League: $500 · AnimalsSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsEBENEZER FOUNDATION INC: $100 · International
Human Services$9,877Other$2,960Food & Nutrition$1,400Health$650Philanthropy$525Animals$500Recreation & Sports$100International$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIDE ON LA RIDE ON THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $5,300 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST CORPORATION: $1,906 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CONEJO VALLEY: $1,671 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanine Adoption and Rescue League: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFit 4 The Cause INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEBENEZER FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Network for GoodFidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to G Kelly Sievers Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on G Kelly Sievers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home