Skip to content

· Private foundation

G & M Owens Fb Owens Fam Fnd Irr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$91kCrime & Legal$35kRecreation & Sports$33kAnimals$32kHealth$31kArts & Culture$26kReligion$26kEnvironment$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMANDA RAE LOREE FOUNDATION INC$25,000
COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT$15,000
SUMMERS BEST TWO WEEKS$10,000
ISAIAH HOUSE$10,000
GOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION$5,000
CHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC$5,000
UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 31 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$293k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+20%

Still filing today

52%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentEducationAnimalsArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $43k · revenue +6%
  • GR
    GOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +282%
  • VB
    VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +916%

Funded once

  • HP
    HORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • IT
    Intermountain Therapy Animals
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -9%
  • RF
    RIDING FOR THE HANDICAPPED
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute

See schedule o for the organization's mission statement.please see description for part i, line 1, above.

Arts & Culture
9
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
10
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
The University of Vermont Medical Center

To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve by integrating patient care, education, and research in a caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Indian River County Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMANDA RAE LOREE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $60,000 · OtherAMANDA RAE LOREE FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $42,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INCCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT: $33,183 · OtherCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENTRIVERSIDE THEATER: $15,500 · OtherRIVERSIDE THEATERUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION: $15,000 · OtherUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATIONISAIAH HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $61,110 · Other+21 moreGOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION: $10,341 · HealthGOLDEN RET…INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · HealthINDIAN RIV…Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice Foundation Inc: $5,100 · HealthVisiting N…Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $3,200 · HealthDartmouth-…FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED: $2,000 · HealthFRONTIER N…+1 more: $500 · HealthWilmington College: $6,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $5,500 · EducationNew York University: $2,400 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $800 · EducationDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $7,000 · AnimalsHORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $3,200 · Arts & CultureMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentGRAND STAIRCASE - ESCALANTE PARTNERS INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $1,000 · EnvironmentIntermountain Therapy Animals: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$247,293Health$30,141Education$14,700Animals$12,000Arts & Culture$10,700Environment$8,500Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC: $42,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION: $10,341 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR LIFE INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWilmington College: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVisiting Nurse Association and Hospice Foundation Inc: $5,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKNOX SCHOOL: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center: $3,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $3,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIntermountain Therapy Animals: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew York University: $2,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGILBERT HART LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND STAIRCASE - ESCALANTE PARTNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVERO BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRutland Hospital Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CAMPS OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN RETRIEVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds DOGS FOR LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Wilmington College ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HORSE PLUS HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds KNOX SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER NURSING SERVICE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds VNA & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc ↗
  • Who funds GILBERT HART LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND STAIRCASE - ESCALANTE PARTNERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization G & M Owens Fb Owens Fam Fnd Irr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from G & M Owens Fb Owens Fam Fnd Irr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Vna & Hospice of the Southwest Region Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Gilbert Hart Library Association: 1% of income from government
  • United Way of Indian River County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Rutland Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on G & M Owens Fb Owens Fam Fnd Irr’s filings →

More from the funding graph