Skip to content

· Private foundation

Futch Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$58kHousing & Shelter$45kCrime & Legal$34kHuman Services$18kEnvironment$6kHealth$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLEVELAND$29,000
PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES$23,314
BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE$22,598
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YWCA$5,000
LUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY$1,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$500
MADISON COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CO$500
LUBEC COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Working Wheels: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 24 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +230% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$110k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+230%
+71%

Still filing today

42%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PL
    PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES
    6× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +274%
  • SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +55%
  • LM
    LUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +306%

Funded once

  • GC
    Grace Covenant Presbyterian Church
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity-Gulf Coast Habitat for Humanity-Gulf Coast
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation Trust for North Carolina

Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…

Environment
2
Asheville Area Arts Council

The mission of artsavl is to keep the arts at the heart of our community. the arts council fulfills its mission by supporting arts professionals and businesses in buncombe county through connection, advocacy, and grants.

Arts & Culture
3
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
4
Asheville GreenWorks

Asheville GreenWorks inspires, equips and mobilizes communities to create an equitable climate-resilient future.

—
5
North Carolina Biotechnology Center

The north carolina biotechnology center aids the biotechnology-related efforts of researchers, businesses, state and federal governments, and other agencies primarily through awards of grants and loans related to specific programs and…

Science & Tech
6
North Carolina Community Foundation

The nccf is the single statewide community foundation serving north carolina and was created in 1988 to build capacity through philanthropy. the nccf administers over 1,300 component funds established to provide long-term support of a…

Philanthropy
7
Asheville Humane Society Inc

Asheville humane society is building a supportive community that posivitely impacts pets and people.

Animals
8
Asheville On Bikes Inc

Asheville on bikes cultivates the culture of urban and commuter cycling through advocacy, education, & celebration. we believe that cycling has a direct impact on the health of our community.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
10
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
11
North Carolina Housing Coalition Inc

The mission of the north carolina housing coalition is to lead a movement to ensure that every north carolinian has a home in which to live with dignity and opportunity. the coalition meets its mission by convening, resourcing, and…

—
12
Thrive Asheville Inc

Thrive asheville's mission is to collaborate with local residents and leaders from diverse perspectives to understand our city's challenges, forge new relationships, and act on the best solutions together.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLEVELAND: $29,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CLEVELANDPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $25,314 · OtherPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES PISGAH LEGAL SERVICESBLUEGRASS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $22,598 · OtherBLUEGRASS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGEBLUEGRASS COMM & TECH COLLEGE FD: $20,000 · OtherBLUEGRASS COMM & TECH COLLEGE FDYWCA: $13,000 · OtherYWCAAB TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIO: $6,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY-GULF COAST: $6,000 · Other+25 more: $33,600 · Other+25 morePISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $8,350 · Crime & LegalLUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $3,400 · EducationREAD TO SUCCEED ASHEVILLE: $350 · EducationHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,750 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,200 · PhilanthropyMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionW4H ASHEVILLE: $1,000 · Human ServicesHELPMATE INC: $650 · Human Services
Other$156,012Crime & Legal$8,350Education$3,750Housing & Shelter$3,750Philanthropy$2,200Food & Nutrition$2,000Human Services$1,650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $8,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $4,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $3,400 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMountainTrue: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetW4H ASHEVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPMATE INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LUBEC MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MountainTrue ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS CAROLINAS PEAKS TO PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds W4H ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds HELPMATE INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBEC COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds READ TO SUCCEED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Richard Eckerd Foundation Inc · United Way of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc · Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community Inc · The Goodman Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Futch Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Futch Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Futch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph