Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fund for Nonviolence

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$15MPhilanthropy$3.4MCommunity Improvement$3.2MCivil Rights$2.8MInternational$655kPublic Benefit$655kHuman Services$615kArts & Culture$345kOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $390k
  • $50k–250k56 grants · $4.5M
  • $250k+9 grants · $4.6M
$50,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PolicyLink$1,000,000
Equal Justice USA$1,000,000
Equal Justice USA$500,000
PolicyLink$500,000
Center For Death Penalty Litigation$472,000
Equal Justice USA$350,000
Center For Death Penalty Litigation$260,000
TX Defender Service$250,000
Tides Center$250,000
Ohioans to Stop Executions$225,000
Alliance for Safety and Justice$170,000
Missourians for Alts to Death Penal$155,000
Tides Foundation$150,000
Native Americans in Philanthropy$150,000
NEO Philanthropy$130,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $50k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $230k → 10%Pillars of the Community: $50k → 11%Youth Passageways: $50k → 8%Equity and Transformation: $100k → 14%BRIDGE AGENCY INC: $15k → 19%Silicon Valley De-Bug: $40k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $340k → 10%Pillars of the Community: $20k → 11%Equity and Transformation: $50k → 14%Silicon Valley De-Bug: $40k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $20k → 11%FORCE Detroit: $50k → 21%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $30k → 8%PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $20k → 11%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $30k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $30k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%THE GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLES AGENDA INC: $25k → 13%Silicon Valley De-Bug: $30k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $30k → 8%Silicon Valley De-Bug: $30k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $25k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $20k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $20k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $20k → 8%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Fund for Nonviolence’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Fund for Nonviolencelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 73 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
38

Total granted

$22M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+18%

Still filing today

75%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EJ
    EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +77% · 28% of their budget
  • CENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +2% · 44% of their budget
  • OT
    OHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $975k · revenue +557% · 97% of their budget

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH CAROLINIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue -23% · 29% of their budget
  • COMMUNITY INITIATIVESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +50%
  • LN
    Libertas Networkgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $65k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
Alliance for Justice

Alliance for justice builds the strength of progressive movements by training and educating nonprofit organizations on advocacy, while harnessing their collective power to transform our state and federal courts.

Civil Rights
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
6
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
7
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
8
Colorofchangeorg

Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…

—
9
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
10
Prison Policy Initiative

The Organization challenges over-criminalizationand mass incarceration through research, advocacyand organizing.

Civil Rights
11
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
12
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink; the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
104/108
Grantees still filing
70/108
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $5,246,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE USA INCOHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS: $975,000 · Civil RightsOHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS+28 more: $2,657,500 · Civil Rights+28 moreCENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION: $2,511,250 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR DEATH PE…THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $543,250 · Crime & LegalTHE PROMISE OF JUST…Advancing Real Change Inc: $538,000 · Crime & LegalAdvancing Real Chan…ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE: $410,000 · Crime & LegalALLIANCE FOR SAFETY…WITNESS TO INNOCENCE: $340,000 · Crime & LegalWITNESS TO INNOCENC…Essie Justice Group: $180,000 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $422,500 · Crime & Legal+5 moreTX Defender Service: $525,000 · OtherTX Defender ServiceDEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER: $270,000 · OtherMissourians for Alts to Death Penal: $245,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $300,000 · Other+61 more: $5,884,000 · Other+61 moreTIDES CENTER: $1,802,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENT…Silicon Valley De-Bug: $415,000 · Human ServicesSilicon Va…PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $170,000 · Human ServicesPILLARS OF…EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesEQUITY AND…+4 more: $140,000 · Human ServicesPOLICYLINK: $1,900,500 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINKCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $265,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …THE WATERSHED CENTER INC: $101,000 · Community Improvement+6 more: $240,000 · Community Improvement+6 moreWin Without War Education Fund: $275,000 · InternationalGlobal Impact: $210,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $140,000 · InternationalPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $120,000 · InternationalNational Iranian American Council: $100,000 · InternationalCenter for Third World Organizing: $46,500 · InternationalCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC: $40,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalTIDES FOUNDATION: $590,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $200,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $65,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · Philanthropy
Civil Rights$8,878,500Crime & Legal$4,945,000Other$7,224,000Human Services$2,677,000Community Improvement$2,506,500International$941,500Philanthropy$855,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE USA INC: $5,246,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetCENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION: $2,511,250 over 7y, 44% of budgetPOLICYLINK: $1,900,500 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $1,802,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetOHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS: $975,000 over 5y, 97% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $590,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $543,250 over 6y, 18% of budgetAdvancing Real Change Inc: $538,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetSilicon Valley De-Bug: $415,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE: $410,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWITNESS TO INNOCENCE: $340,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $300,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWin Without War Education Fund: $275,000 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetCATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK: $267,500 over 6y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $265,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Defender Service: $255,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMOMENTUM COMMUNITY INC: $225,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights: $215,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTEXAS COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY: $210,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetGlobal Impact: $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEssie Justice Group: $180,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY: $180,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $180,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNevada Coalition Against the Death Penalty: $180,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTENNESSEANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY: $175,000 over 4y, 46% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA: $175,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY: $170,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetMissourians to Abolish the Death Penalty: $160,000 over 5y, 28% of budgetEQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $150,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetNative Americans in Philanthropy: $150,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAtlantic Center for Capital Representation Inc: $150,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetFP YouthOutcry Foundation Inc DBA The Hubb Arts & Trauma Center: $145,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $140,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC: $140,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $135,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEATH PENALTY ALTERNATIVES FOR ARIZONA INC: $135,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetThe Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc: $125,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetINITIATE JUSTICE: $120,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE: $110,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT: $110,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WATERSHED CENTER INC: $101,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetMISSION TALK INC: $100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNational Iranian American Council: $100,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION ↗
  • Who funds POLICYLINK ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OHIOANS TO STOP EXECUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Advancing Real Change Inc ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley De-Bug ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds WITNESS TO INNOCENCE ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Win Without War Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds Texas Defender Service ↗
  • Who funds MOMENTUM COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY ↗
  • Who funds Global Impact ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Essie Justice Group ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY COALITION TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY ↗
  • Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Nevada Coalition Against the Death Penalty ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO THE DEATH PENALTY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds Missourians to Abolish the Death Penalty ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationCA65.7× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Center · New Venture Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Heising-Simons Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fund for Nonviolence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fund for Nonviolence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Fp YouthOutcry Foundation Inc Dba the Hubb Arts & Trauma Center: 29% of income from government
  • Advancing Real Change Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fund for Nonviolence?

Find your warmest path to Fund for Nonviolence through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fund for Nonviolence’s filings →

More from the funding graph