Skip to content

· Private foundation

Full Circle Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$265kReligion$70kHealth$61kAnimals$35kCommunity Improvement$16kFood & Nutrition$13kYouth Development$10kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AID 4 OTHERS$20,000
SCOTTIE'S GIFT FOUNDATION$20,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL - WINTER'S CHAPTER$20,000
HOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM (HART)$10,000
COMMUNITY CARE CAR INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN NORTHERN CA$2,500
ALMANOR FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SCOTTIE'S GIFT FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%SCOTTIE'S GIFT FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%SCOTTIE'S GIFT FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%RANGER ROAD: $15k → 12%PATRIOTS FOR VETERANS: $3k → 16%PATRIOTS FOR VETERANS: $3k → 16%PATRIOTS FOR VETERANS: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Full Circle Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 77%.

Full Circle Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 13 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$437k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+83%

Still filing today

46%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CARE CAR
    7× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +136%
  • A4
    AID 4 OTHERS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL - WINTER'S CHAPTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k

Funded once

  • RR
    RANGER ROADgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +100%
  • NC
    NEWMAN CATHOLIC CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of the Salinas Valley

No senior should go hungry. nutritious meals, which are delivered by caring volunteers, improve the health and well-being of people who are homebound, elderly, or disabled and help them remain in their homes and maintain their independence.

Food & Nutrition
2
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
3
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
4
Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc

Provide funding for meals for homebound seniors in Contra Costa County.

Food & Nutrition
5
Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

—
7
Service Opportunity for Seniors

We foster the independence and dignity of older adults by reducing food insecurity and isolation, with daily nutritious meals, friendly visits, and connection to support services.

Food & Nutrition
8
Bay Area Barns and Trails
Human Services
9
Meals On Wheels of Alameda County

MOWAC's mission is to assist frail, homebound seniors to maintain their independence by fundraising and providing financial support, community outreach and strategic assistance to Meals on Wheels programs in Alameda County that deliver…

Food & Nutrition
10
Southern California Wheelchair Veterans Association

To aid and assist veterans of the armed forces in southern california who are disabled, paralyzed, confined in wheelchairs, terminally ill, hospitalized, or confined in nursing homes to a more qualified way of life through recreation,…

Human Services
11
Sonoma County Deputy Sheriffs K-9 Association

To provide health care for retired k-9 deputies. educate the public in the roll k-9 deputies play in law enforcment

Crime & Legal
12
Meals On Wheels California Inc

To provide a unified voice advocating for seniors and broaden the impact of our programs across the state of california; to improve the lives of seniors, adults with disabilities, and their families.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels of Solano County; the most unlike its peers is Community Care Car. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY CARE CAR: $65,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CARE CARAID 4 OTHERS: $60,000 · OtherAID 4 OTHERSST VINCENT DE PAUL - WINTER'S CHAPTER: $60,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL - WINTER'S CHAPTERYUBA CITY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherYUBA CITY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCHST VINCENT DE PAUL: $50,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULSHRINER'S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN NORTHERN CA: $16,100 · Other+5 more: $33,100 · Other+5 moreSCOTTIES GIFT FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesSCOTTIES GIFT FO…RANGER ROAD: $15,000 · Human ServicesRANGER ROADPATRIOTS FOR VETERANS INC: $7,800 · Human ServicesPATRIOTS FOR VET…HOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $35,000 · AnimalsTHE ALMANOR FOUNDATION: $16,000 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $7,500 · Food & NutritionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$344,200Human Services$67,800Animals$35,000Philanthropy$16,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CAR: $65,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetSCOTTIES GIFT FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetHOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM: $35,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetTHE ALMANOR FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetRANGER ROAD: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetPATRIOTS FOR VETERANS INC: $7,800 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SOLANO COUNTY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CAR ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTIES GIFT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS ANIMAL RESCUE TEAM ↗
  • Who funds THE ALMANOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RANGER ROAD ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOTS FOR VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS YOLO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF SOLANO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Full Circle Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Full Circle Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Full Circle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph