Skip to content

· Private foundation

Friendships in Faith Ministries Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
9
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2026.

Religion$151kHealth$14kHuman Services$7kInternational$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$100Other$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$53k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$8,750
SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY SERVICES$5,000
HEART OF WORSHIP CHURCH$1,450
PURE CHARITY$1,155
BRIDGE FOR PEACE$1,100
DENNIS & JACKIE BAMBINO MINISTIRES$1,000
ALL NATIONS CHURCH$1,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC$1,000
ANGELICAN DIOCESE OF NEW ENGLAND$1,000
IMMERSE MINISTRIES$800
BLOOMERANG$750
Individual grant recipient$500
INTERCESSORS FOR AMERICA$26
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ANGELICAN DIOCESE OF NEW ENGLAND: $2k → 10%GLOBAL AWAKENING: $1k → 8%U TURN FOR CHRIST: $1k → 11%CHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $4k → 14%NY ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $5k → 7%E3 PARTNERS: $5k → 5%DENNIS & JACKIE BAMBINO MINISTIRES: $1k → 16%ALL NATIONS CHURCH: $1k → 8%TOUCHING NATIONS TODAY INC: $1k → 12%PURE E3 PARTNERS: $5k → 7%AMBASSADORS TO THE NATION: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 12%CALVARY CHAPEL CROSSROADS-CEDAR RANCH RETREAT CENTER: $1k → 8%THE ANGELICAN DIOCESE OF NEW ENGLAND: $1k → 10%GLOBAL AWAKENING: $1k → 8%CHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $3k → 14%NY ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $2k → 7%ALL NATIONS CHURCH: $4k → 17%PURE CHARITY: $2k → 5%DENNIS & JACKIE BAMBINO MINISTIRES: $1k → 16%PUREE3PARTNERS: $2k → 7%FREEDOM CHRISTIAN CENTER: $1k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 12%ANGELICAN DIOCESE OF NEW ENGLAND: $1k → 10%CHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $2k → 14%PURE CHARITY: $1k → 5%CHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $2k → 14%BRIDGE FOR PEACE: $6k → 7%SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY SERVICES: $5k → 7%BRIDGE FOR PEACE: $4k → 7%SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY SERVICES: $4k → 7%BRIDGE FOR PEACE: $3k → 7%SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY SERVICES: $3k → 7%BRIDGE FOR PEACE: $1k → 7%SOUNDVIEW PREGNANCY SERVICES: $2k → 7%CHURCH ON THE SOUND: $2k → 7%KINGDOM CONVERGENCE: $1k → 7%KINGDOM CONVERGENCE: $1k → 7%JEFFERSON TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD: $2k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $12k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $9k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $8k → 7%MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $7k → 7%COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 7%HEART OF WORSHIP: $3k → 7%HEART OF WORSHIP CHURCH: $2k → 7%HEART OF WORSHIP CHURCH: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
SD
IN
PA
CA
VA
TN
NC
SC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$145k · 19 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
24

Total granted

$145k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+40%

Still filing today

16%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARE CENTER INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $14k · revenue +0%
  • BF
    Bridge for Peace Inc
    4× · 2022–2026 · $14k · revenue +64%
  • PR
    PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • EP
    E3 Partners Ministry
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • AN
    ALL NATIONS CHURCH
    one grant, 2025 · $4k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $49,127 · OtherMATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGS: $11,141 · OtherCHURCH OF GLAD TIDINGSBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOC: $8,093 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCPURE E3 PARTNERS: $7,105 · OtherNY ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $6,500 · Other+35 more: $52,188 · Other+35 moreBridge for Peace Inc: $14,075 · ReligionBridge for Peace…E3 Partners Ministry: $5,000 · ReligionE3 Partners Mini…PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $4,502 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN REF…TOUCHING NATIONS TODAY INC: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $190 · ReligionTHE CARE CENTER INC: $14,250 · Civil RightsTHE CARE …Crisis Response International: $100 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$134,154Religion$24,767Civil Rights$14,250Public Safety & Disaster$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CARE CENTER INC: $14,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBridge for Peace Inc: $14,075 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $4,502 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTOUCHING NATIONS TODAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCrisis Response International: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridge for Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds E3 Partners Ministry ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHING NATIONS TODAY INC ↗
  • Who funds BREATH OF LIFE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friendships in Faith Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friendships in Faith Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friendships in Faith Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Friendships in Faith Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friendships in Faith Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph