Skip to content
Friendship Apartment Village Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Friendship Apartment Village Corporation

Supporting friends by providing peace of mind

$193k
Granted FY2020
7
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$183kHuman Services$85kEducation$81kPhilanthropy$32kRecreation & Sports$25kArts & Culture$20kScience & Tech$20kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2020 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $57,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $193,217 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,717 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC$15,000
VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC$10,000
THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE$10,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$7,500
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
YMCA OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TOTAL ACTION FOR PROGRESS: $5k → 20%THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE: $15k → 20%THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE: $10k → 20%THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE: $10k → 20%THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$325k · 9 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$325k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+6%

Still filing today

89%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +49%
  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +26%
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $40k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • SR
    Southeast Regional Training Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +200%
  • SM
    SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -6%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
2
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
3
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
4
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
5
West Virginia University Research Corporation

To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.

Education
6
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
7
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
8
Virginia Tech Transportation Economic Development Inc

Vttedi builds a base of research, engineering education, advanced testing, and technology transfer that significantly impacts industrial practice and productivity through the development of advanced materials, intelligent tire technologies…

Education
9
Virginia Maryland and Delaware Association of Electric Cooperatives

Trade association for electric cooperatives

—
10
Northern Virginia Technology Council Inc

The mission of the northern virginia technology council (nvtc) is to accelerate tech innovation and promote a world class workforce. nvtc connects, educates, advocates and celebrates the region's thriving tech ecosystem.

—
11
Virginia Wesleyan University

Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.

—
12
Mcv Associated Physicians

The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $67,543 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DFRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC: $40,000 · HealthFRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $22,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNIT…VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,660 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION …Southeast Regional Training Center Inc: $25,000 · EducationSoutheast Regional Traini…RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC: $35,825 · OtherVIRGINIA TECH CARILI…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $20,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…THE SALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYW E SKELTON 4-H EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER AT SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE: $7,580 · OtherW E SKELTON 4-H EDUC…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS INC: $5,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES …THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE M…TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY: $5,000 · Human ServicesTOTAL ACTION…UNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $32,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…CENTER IN THE SQUARE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER IN …SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGRANDIN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSeniorNavigatorcom: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Health$147,543Education$105,660Other$83,405Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$42,000Arts & Culture$30,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $67,543 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC: $35,825 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $32,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSeniorNavigatorcom: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetW E SKELTON 4-H EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER AT SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE: $7,580 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRANDIN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Carilion Medical Cent…Robertson Family Foun…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Elbert H Evelyn J & K…Cartledge Charitable …Muse Family Foundatio…Delta Dental of Virgi…The Ceres Foundation …Wells Fargo FoundationTruist Foundation IncCharities Aid Foundat…
Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Carilion Medical Center · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Elbert H Evelyn J & Karen H Waldron Charitable Foundation · Cartledge Charitable Foundation Inc · Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse · Delta Dental of Virginia Foundation · The Ceres Foundation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friendship Apartment Village Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friendship Apartment Village Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friendship Apartment Village’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home