· Public charity
Friendship Apartment Village Corporation
Supporting friends by providing peace of mind
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $57,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $193,217 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $135,717 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k4 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC | $10,000 |
| THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $7,500 |
| YMCA OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1D2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +49%
- TRTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +26%
- FHFRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC3× · 2018–2020 · $40k · revenue +48%
Funded once
- SRSoutheast Regional Training Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +200%
- SMSCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIAone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -6%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.
To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
Vttedi builds a base of research, engineering education, advanced testing, and technology transfer that significantly impacts industrial practice and productivity through the development of advanced materials, intelligent tire technologies…
Trade association for electric cooperatives
The mission of the northern virginia technology council (nvtc) is to accelerate tech innovation and promote a world class workforce. nvtc connects, educates, advocates and celebrates the region's thriving tech ecosystem.
Virginia wesleyan university is a fully accredited liberal arts, united-methodist related institution founded in 1961.
The mission of the organization is to provide physicians and other healthcare professionals to support the needs of the community, as well as the academic mission of the vcu school of medicine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSHIP HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA TECH CARILION SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Regional Training Center Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF VIRGINIA'S BLUE RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MUSEUM OF WESTERN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SeniorNavigatorcom ↗
- Who funds CENTER IN THE SQUARE ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds W E SKELTON 4-H EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER AT SMITH MOUNTAIN LAKE ↗
- Who funds GRANDIN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MILL MOUNTAIN PLAYHOUSE CO INC DBA MILL MOUNTAIN THEATRE ↗
- Who funds TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN THE ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE VALLEYS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Carilion Medical Center · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Elbert H Evelyn J & Karen H Waldron Charitable Foundation · Cartledge Charitable Foundation Inc · Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse · Delta Dental of Virginia Foundation · The Ceres Foundation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Friendship Apartment Village Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.