Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Friends of the Earth

FRIENDS OF THE EARTH strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the environment and enhances people's well being and by building movements in the u.s.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Environment$4.1MPublic Benefit$300kFood & Nutrition$137kEducation$93kHuman Services$93kCivil Rights$85kCrime & Legal$55kCommunity Improvement$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $887,096 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,052,897 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $165,801 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $238k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $272k
  • $250k+1 grant · $360k
$20,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC$360,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$92,000
A WELL-FED WORLD$80,000
ACTION FOR THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY$50,000
CHECK MY ADS INSTITUTE$50,000
REBUILD DEMOCRACY$42,750
CHARLESTON COMM RESTO ACT BOARD$25,000
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT$20,000
PARENTS ENGAGING PARENTS INC$20,000
SUSSEX HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK INC$20,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$20,000
DELAWARE COMMUNITY BENEFITS AGREEMENT COALITION$15,000
NEBRASKA COMMUNITIES UNITED$12,360
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$11,000
BLACK VEG SOCIETY$11,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%HALIWA SAPONI INDIAN TRIBE: $13k → 20%LOWCOUNTRY ALLIANCE FOR MODEL COMMUNITIES: $10k → 12%LOWCOUNTRY ALLIANCE FOR MODEL COMMUNITIES: $10k → 12%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 58% of Friends of the Earth’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 64% of the giving stays in DC; read by stated purpose it is 9% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Friends of the Earthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 16 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
35

Total granted

$3.7M
$789k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
0%

Still filing today

94%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionInternationalPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +39% · 40% of their budget
  • MM
    MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA
    2× · 2023–2025 · $174k · revenue +12%
  • GA
    Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +353%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • YF
    YES FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY OVER FRACKING
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
2
Advocates for Climate Innovation
Philanthropy
3
Environment Now
—
4
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
5
Earthworks

The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Earthworks is dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the impacts of irresponsible mineral and energy development while seeking…

Public Benefit
6
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
9
E3G Third Generation Environmentalism

E3g is a leading international not-for-profit think tank specialising in climate diplomacy harnessing expertise in the politics and economics of climate change.

Environment
10
International Council On Environmental Economics and Development Union
Human Services
11
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
12
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Savannah River Site Watch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsImmigrant Worker SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr14%12%5–10yr18%25%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr15%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%5%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr18%11%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr15%59%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/67
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,934

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
29/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC — $2,710,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC+17 more — $503,700 · Other+17 moreLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION…SOUTH WARD ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE — $142,800 · EnvironmentSOUTH WARD ENVIRONMENT…GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentGOODPOWER EDUCATION FU…Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives — $100,000 · EnvironmentGlobal Alliance for In…West Harlem Environmental Action Inc — $77,000 · EnvironmentWest Harlem Environmen…GreenLatinos — $70,000 · EnvironmentGreenLatinosENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 · EnvironmentSavannah River Site Watch — $50,000 · Environment+14 more — $228,300 · Environment+14 moreMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $174,000 · EducationCheck My Ads Institute — $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $22,000 · EducationPARENTS ENGAGING PARENTS — $20,000 · Education+3 more — $26,000 · EducationA Well-Fed World — $80,000 · Food & NutritionSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionNebraska Communities United — $12,360 · Food & NutritionBLACK VEGETARIAN SOCIETY OF MARYLAND — $11,000 · Food & NutritionCHESAPEAKE INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SUSTAINABLE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE I — $11,000 · Food & NutritionIDEAGARDEN INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $50,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT — $35,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — $15,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $10,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW INC — $7,500 · InternationalHarambee House Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesLOWCOUNTRY ALLIANCE FOR MODEL COMMUNITIE — $20,000 · Human ServicesHALIWA SAPONI TRIBE INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesUS RIGHT TO KNOW — $10,000 · Human ServicesCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $50,000 · Public BenefitOil Change International Inc — $11,000 · Public BenefitGROWW EDUCATION INC — $9,486 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $8,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,213,700Environment$968,100Education$317,000Food & Nutrition$149,360International$117,500Human Services$98,000Public Benefit$78,486

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH (ACTION) INC — $2,710,000 over 9y, 40% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA — $174,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSOUTH WARD ENVIRONMENTAL ALLIANCE — $142,800 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGlobal Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetIronbound Community Corporation — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetA Well-Fed World — $80,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetWest Harlem Environmental Action Inc — $77,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreenLatinos — $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNAMATI INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATALYST CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSavannah River Site Watch — $50,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT — $35,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetGREENFAITH INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHarambee House Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCOHARIE INTRA-TRIBAL COUNCIL INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTHY GULF — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $22,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY ALLIANCE FOR MODEL COMMUNITIE — $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY INITIATIVE EDUCATION FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS ENGAGING PARENTS — $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHALIWA SAPONI TRIBE INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRainforest Action Network — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUISIANA BUCKET BRIGADE — $11,800 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOil Change International Inc — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDEAGARDEN INSTITUTE INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS RIGHT TO KNOW — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Sanders Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY — $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND PESTICIDE EDUCATION NETWORK INC — $8,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tides FoundationThe Schmidt Family Fo…Windward FundUnited States Energy …ImpactassetsincPatagoniaorgAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundClimateworks Foundati…Solutions Project IncThe Energy FoundationNatural Resources Def…
Tides FoundationCA28.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Windward Fund · United States Energy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Patagoniaorg · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Climateworks Foundation · Solutions Project Inc · The Energy Foundation · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Friends of the Earth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home