Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Friends of Front Street Shelter

We're committed to improving the lives of all stray, abandoned, and abused animals who come to the Front Street Animal Shelter.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$1.6MHealth$14kPublic Benefit$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $265,905 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $307,855 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $41,950 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $195k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Spay Neuter Clinic$195,405
The Chester Foundation$35,000
City of Sacramento$10,150
Coalition for Community Cats$7,500
Itsie Bitsie Rescue Inc$7,400
Kitten Crossing Rescue$5,400
Wylie Animal Rescue$5,050
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Howards Hound Haven: $6k → 6%Fat Kitty City: $6k → 8%Martina Animal Rescue: $14k → 10%Itsie Bitsie Rescue Inc: $7k → 12%Rotts of Friends Animal Res: $8k → 16%Norcal Bully Breed Rescue: $11k → 6%Martina Animal Rescue: $12k → 10%Itsie Bitsie Rescue Inc: $6k → 12%Rotts of Friends Animal Res: $5k → 16%Elevation Animal Rescue: $25k → 6%City of Sacramento: $147k → 12%UCD School of Veterinary Med: $7k → 16%Kitten Crossing Rescue: $5k → 6%City of Sacramento: $57k → 12%City of Sacramento: $50k → 12%City of Sacramento: $40k → 12%City of Sacramento: $10k → 12%Kimmies Kritters: $6k → 12%Resilient Dog Rescue: $8k → 12%SPCA Inc: $10k → 12%SPCA: $6k → 12%SPCA Inc: $6k → 12%Rio Linda Feral Help Group: $8k → 12%A Place Fur Rescue: $6k → 12%Elica Health Centers: $14k → 12%The Chester Foundation: $35k → 12%The Chester Foundation: $35k → 12%Front Street Animal Shelter: $50k → 12%The Chester Foundation: $35k → 12%Fosters and Paws: $7k → 12%Simbas Paw Dog Rescue: $6k → 12%Front Street Animal Shelter: $5k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $25k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $15k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $15k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $198k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $10k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $195k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $10k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $145k → 12%Sacramento Area Animal Coal: $10k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $108k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $10k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $104k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $10k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $27k → 12%Coalition for Community Cats: $8k → 12%Community Spay Neuter Clinic: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$1.4M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+64%

Still filing today

78%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Community Spay Neuter Clinic
    7× · 2019–2025 · $787k · revenue +70%
  • SS
    SACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    3× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +79%
  • RO
    ROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • EA
    Elevation Animal Rescue
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • Elica Health Centersgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +64%
  • NB
    NORCAL BULLY BREED RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Solano County Friends of Animals

Animal rescue of abandoned cats and dogs

Animals
3
Adopt and Save a Life Rescue Mission Inc
4
Kitten Around Cat Rescue
Animals
5
Purrfect Friends Cat Rescue

Cat Rescue

Animals
6
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
7
Tabby Tails Cat Rescue

To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.

Animals
8
Sos Lost Pet Rescue Nw Inc

Decrease over population of feral cats by trapping and doing spay or neuter. Provide veterinarian care to kittens. Take owner relinquishments of pets they can no longer care for. Taking in abandoned animals and providing veterinary care.…

Animals
9
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
10
Cocoa Kitties

Animal rescue

Animals
11
Pound Pets Inc

Animal Rescue - finding homes for abandoned animals in Granite City, spaying and neutering stray animals and feral cats

Animals
12
Claws and Paws for a Cause

For our community we provide high quality low cost spay and neuter services as well as low cost vaccinations. we do have programs that allows us to help the families that have pets but are in financial strain and not able to have their…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fosters & Paws and the most unlike its peers is Elica Health Centers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Community Spay Neuter Clinic — $786,594 · AnimalsCommunity Spay Neuter ClinicThe Chester Foundation — $105,000 · AnimalsThe Chester FoundationCoalition for Community Cats — $102,750 · AnimalsCoalition for Community Cats+12 more — $138,345 · Animals+12 moreCity of Sacramento — $358,064 · OtherCity of SacramentoElevation Animal Rescue — $24,780 · OtherElevation Animal Rescue+7 more — $44,687 · Other+7 moreElica Health Centers — $14,027 · Health
Animals$1,132,689Other$427,531Health$14,027

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Spay Neuter Clinic — $786,594 over 7y, 13% of budgetThe Chester Foundation — $105,000 over 3y, 60% of budgetCoalition for Community Cats — $102,750 over 8y, 37% of budgetMARTINA ANIMAL RESCUE — $25,719 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $21,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetElica Health Centers — $14,027 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE — $13,200 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FELINES RESCUE — $13,150 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetItsie Bitsie Rescue Inc — $13,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetNORCAL BULLY BREED RESCUE — $11,450 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetScooters Pals — $7,476 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFOSTERS & PAWS — $7,250 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetFAT KITTY CITY HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,600 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetKITTEN CROSSING RESCUE INC — $5,400 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Thornton S Jr and Katrina D Glide Foundation · Petco Love · Petsmart Charities Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Friends of Front Street Shelter funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friends of Front Street Shelter?

    Find your warmest path to Friends of Front Street Shelter through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph