Skip to content

· Private foundation

Friends of Fish Foundation

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2019
13
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Environment$428kAnimals$130kYouth Development$68kCrime & Legal$50kReligion$3k
02FY2019 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
PENNSYLVANIA PARKS & FORESTS FOUNDATION$50,000
CAST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION$50,000
BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST$50,000
PA STEELHEAD ASSOCIATION$50,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$50,000
COPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION$50,000
WILD OCEANS$50,000
SONS OF LAKE ERIE$50,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$50,000
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK$30,000
WEST CHESTER FISH GAME & WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%REEL EXPECTATIONS: $1k → 11%DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK: $30k → 6%PENNSYLVANIA PARKS & FORESTS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%NORWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 10%PA STEELHEAD ASSOCIATION: $50k → 15%FISHING FOR HEROES: $30k → 14%BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST: $50k → 15%COPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION: $50k → 5%CAST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%WILD OCEANS: $50k → 4%TROUT UNLIMITED: $50k → 7%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%REEL EXPECTATIONS: $1k → 11%NORWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 10%SEA GRANT PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 15%CAST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%WILD OCEANS: $10k → 4%CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%SEA GRANT PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 15%CAST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%WILD OCEANS: $8k → 4%SEA GRANT PENNSYLVANIA: $8k → 15%SONS OF LAKE ERIE: $50k → 15%SONS OF LAKE ERIE: $10k → 15%SONS OF LAKE ERIE: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
PA
VA
MD
DE
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Friends of Fish Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 44% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 40%.

Friends of Fish Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 7 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$339k
$340k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-26%

Still filing today

43%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $68k
  • SO
    SONS OF LAKE ERIE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $68k
  • WO
    WILD OCEANS INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $68k · revenue -60%

Funded once

  • PP
    PENNSYLVANIA PARKS AND FORESTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +133%
  • BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Trout Inc

Caltrout's mission is ensuring healthy water and resilient wild fish for a better california. we share a common vision of a california where healthy waters flow from headwaters to sea. where the diversity and resilience of our waters and…

Animals
2
Wild Salmon Rivers

To conserve functioning salmon/steelhead eco-system at watershed levels, integrate angling activities with basic scientific research, collect raw data, monitor environmental functions, salmon/steelhead population dynamics, public…

Environment
3
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
4
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
5
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
6
Protect Maine's Fishing Heritage Foundation
Environment
7
Fishery Foundation of California

To improve fisheries resources in the state of california.

Animals
8
Clean Reefs
Environment
9
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
10
American Littoral Society

Promote the study and conservation of marine life and its habitat, defend the coast from harm, and empower others to do the same.

Environment
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
The Wilton Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cast (Catch a Special Thrill) for Kids Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cops and Kids Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSONS OF LAKE ERIE: $68,000 · OtherSONS OF LAKE ERIEWILD OCEANS INC: $68,000 · OtherWILD OCEANS INCCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $68,000 · OtherCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATIONPA STEELHEAD ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherPA STEELHEAD ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST CHESTER FISH GAME & WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherWEST CHESTER FISH GAME & WILDLIFE ASSOCIATIONDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK: $30,000 · OtherDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK+2 more: $5,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY FOU…PENNSYLVANIA PARKS AND FORESTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentPENNSYLVANIA PARKS…TROUT UNLIMITED INC: $50,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNLIMITED …BONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $50,000 · AnimalsBONEFISH & TARPO…COPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Education
Other$417,000Environment$112,000Animals$100,000Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILD OCEANS INC: $68,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCAST (CATCH A SPECIAL THRILL) FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $68,000 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $62,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA PARKS AND FORESTS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCOPS AND KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetDELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friends of Fish Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friends of Fish Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Friends of Fish Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Friends of Fish Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Friends of Fish’s filings →

More from the funding graph