· Private foundation
Frey Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLORIA DEI LUTHERAN CHURCH | $18,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| FAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY | $6,000 |
| REDWOOD | $5,000 |
| TRINITY LUTHERAN SEMINARY | $5,000 |
| PEACHTREE ROAD LUTHERAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| BE CONCERNED | $4,000 |
| THE PIARIST SCHOOL | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA - RAJ MEHTA ENDOWMENT | $2,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| PAUL LAMMERMEIR FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RSRedwood School & Rehabilitation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +48%
- BCBE CONCERNED INC4× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +83%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- CSCRESCENT SPRINGSVILLA HILLS FIRE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2024 · $4k
- GSGEORGIA SALZBURGER SOCIETYone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +9%
- CPCOLOMA PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.
The organization's mission is to provide housing, health care, and other personal services to elderly residents through the operation of a continuing care retirement community in tampa, florida.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc and the most unlike its peers is McComb Bruchs Performing Arts Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY PHARMACY INC ↗
- Who funds Redwood School & Rehabilitation Inc ↗
- Who funds BE CONCERNED INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE POINTARC OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COVINGTON LADIES HOME INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA SALZBURGER SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY SENIOR CITIZENS APARTMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc ↗
- Who funds TATTOO REMOVAL INK INC ↗
- Who funds Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc ↗
- Who funds McComb Bruchs Performing Arts Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Butler Foundation · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig · The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc · Maxwell C Weaver Foundation · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frey Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.