Skip to content
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

$492k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$105MHousing & Shelter$575kEducation$505kFood & Nutrition$290kPublic Benefit$237kInternational$205kCommunity Improvement$122kHuman Services$113kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $447,129, the rows itemized in this filing. The $492,306 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $45,177 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $267k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARJAREE MASON CENTER$105,000
ADVANCED ARMENIA FOUNDATION$100,000
FRESNO RESCUE MISSION$61,840
CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES$43,329
FOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS$40,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR FRESNO SCHOOLS$25,000
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK$16,960
BLACK WELLNESS AND PROSPERITY CENTER$10,000
READING AND BEYOND$10,000
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $349k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRESNO EOC FOOD SERVICE: $25k → 19%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $7k → 19%FRESNO METRO MINISTRY: $105k → 19%FRESNO METRO MINISTRY: $100k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $105k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$106M · 14 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
11

Total granted

$106M
$444k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SANTE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $102M · revenue +63%
  • FAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.7M · revenue +174%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2018–2024 · $175k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MC
    MADERA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -50%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $37k · revenue +29%
  • FC
    Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commissiongraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
2
Central Valley Health Foundation

The Central Valley Health Foundation (CVHF) is a California not-for-profit corporation. The Foundation was organized to coordinate the solicitation of contributions through its operations and to disburse such contributions, earnings, and…

Philanthropy
3
Community Hospitals of Central California Foundation

Chccf exists to better the lives of all those we serve.

Health
4
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
5
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
6
Cal Med Foundation
Education
7
Community Health Partners

Community health partners' mission is to build the valley's premier integrated healthcare delivery system that reliably meets the healthcare needs of our region while exceeding patient expectations.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
10
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn
Philanthropy
11
Clinica De Salud Del Valle De Salinas

Clinica de Salud del Valle de Salinas (CSVS) is dedicated to providing access to quality comprehensive health care to men, women and children with an emphasis on farm worker families and the agricultural community.

Health
12
Central Valley Medical Center

The mission of Central Valley Medical Center is to provide sensitive, compassionate health care of the highest quality to our patients, their families, and friends. We do this in a manner that encourages the efficient use of resources…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Children's Healthcare Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Advance Armenia Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
11/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANTE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $102,157,230 · HealthSANTE HEALTH FOUNDATION+6 more: $2,259,885 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $505,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS: $140,000 · EducationTHE BULLDOG FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+3 more: $65,000 · EducationFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $574,840 · Housing & ShelterCalifornia Hospitals Committee on Issues: $237,076 · OtherCENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCE: $122,000 · OtherCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $36,504 · OtherCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $20,000 · OtherBlack Wellness & Prosperity Center: $19,760 · Other+3 more: $30,000 · OtherFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $205,000 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $112,500 · Human ServicesFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesAdvance Armenia Foundation: $205,000 · InternationalFRESNO SHERIFFS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitCentral Valley Black Nurses Association Inc: $16,000 · Public Benefit
Health$104,417,115Education$810,000Housing & Shelter$574,840Other$465,340Human Services$349,000International$205,000Public Benefit$41,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $102,157,230 over 4y, 16% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $1,745,425 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $574,840 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $505,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMADERA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $250,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCalifornia Hospitals Committee on Issues: $237,076 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFresno Metropolitan Ministry: $205,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetAdvance Armenia Foundation: $205,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $175,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CLOVIS SCHOOLS: $140,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMENS CONFERENCE: $122,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $112,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BULLDOG FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $57,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $36,504 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Fresno Unified Students: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO SHERIFFS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlack Wellness & Prosperity Center: $19,760 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA BLOOD CENTER: $16,960 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Valley Black Nurses Association Inc: $16,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCPE OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING AND BEYOND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA 9-11 MEMORIAL: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetEVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Agnes Medical C…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Community Hospitals o…Educational Employees…The California Endowm…California Healthcare…The California Wellne…Fresno Metropolitan M…The Edward M and Jean…Sierra Health Foundat…The James Irvine Foun…The Richard & Althea …
Saint Agnes Medical CenterCA28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Agnes Medical Center · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Community Hospitals of Central California · Educational Employees Credit Union · The California Endowment · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Fresno Metropolitan Ministry · The Edward M and Jeanne C Kashian Family Foundation Inc · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The James Irvine Foundation · The Richard & Althea Johanson Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home