Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Freewill Impact Fund

FREEWILL IMPACT FUND's mission is to make charitable giving especially easy, so donors can support their favorite nonprofit organizations without traditional pain points in non-cash giving, and make a truly remarkable impact on the world.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
91
Grants FY2024still arriving
30
States reached
$5.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212024.

Philanthropy$6.1MInternational$1.7MYouth Development$1.0MHealth$624kHousing & Shelter$557kEnvironment$379kAnimals$311kHuman Services$248kEducation$211kOther$4.8M
02FY2024 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 91 grants below total $10,992,875 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,852,523 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $859,648 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $186k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $701k
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+6 grants · $7.6M
$20,072
Median grant
30
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,430,494
DISCOVERY INSTITUTE$607,773
VERDE VALLEY SCHOOL$552,500
PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$396,034
CURE BLINDNESS PROJECT$332,940
GRACE FAMILY CHURCH OF NORTH TAMPA$274,146
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA$187,427
CONSERVATION NORTHWEST$166,222
HEAL PALESTINE$163,570
PRATHAM USA$149,392
THE PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$136,747
HUNTERDON HEALTH$134,114
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$130,275
MALARIA CONSORTIUM US$118,351
NORTH AMERICAN CULTURAL LABORATORY$106,740
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE: $67k → 14%JAMAICA RELIEF MINISTRIES: $15k → 17%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $81k → 15%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $9k → 15%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $5k → 17%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 15%YWCA USA: $11k → 14%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $18k → 11%ASCEND - LEADERSHIP THROUGH ATHLETICS INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 34 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
52

Total granted

$4.4M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+4%

Still filing today

76%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DI
    DISCOVERY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $962k · revenue +16%
  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $362k · revenue +343%
  • CN
    CONSERVATION NW
    2× · 2023–2024 · $238k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • A
    AI4ALLgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +29% · 42% of their budget
  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $181k · revenue +32%
  • CA
    CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $86k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
8
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Climate Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Elementary Literacy TutoringLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Local History MuseumsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Christian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/151
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,414

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/116
Grantees still filing
56/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,430,494 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+8 more — $631,419 · Philanthropy+8 moreDISCOVERY INSTITUTE — $962,452 · OtherDISCOVERY INSTITUTEVERDE VALLEY SCHOOL — $552,500 · OtherVERDE VALLEY SCHOOLPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $532,781 · OtherPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDGRACE FAMILY CHURCH INC — $274,146 · OtherDIOCESE OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS — $191,658 · OtherMUTTVILLE — $225,985 · Other+92 more — $2,786,612 · Other+92 moreHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $362,105 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CA…KIVA MICROFUNDS — $336,270 · InternationalKIVA MICROFU…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $180,762 · InternationalPALESTINE CH…HEAL PALESTINE INC — $163,570 · InternationalHEAL PALESTI…DOUBLE UP DRIVE INC — $157,474 · InternationalDOUBLE UP DR…THE FUND FOR AFRICAN RELIEF AND EDUCATION — $103,691 · InternationalTHE FUND FOR…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $97,670 · InternationalAMERICARES F…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $61,702 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $61,702 · InternationalMercy Corps — $61,702 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $61,702 · International+6 more — $76,550 · InternationalAI4ALL — $1,005,179 · Youth Development+2 more — $21,468 · Youth DevelopmentNAMI National — $157,691 · HealthHUNTERDON REGIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $134,114 · HealthMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC — $118,351 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $54,743 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital — $41,385 · HealthPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $31,941 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $31,829 · Health+6 more — $53,950 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $437,102 · Housing & ShelterTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT — $102,122 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $17,669 · Housing & ShelterCONSERVATION NW — $237,620 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $85,594 · EnvironmentFriends of the Columbia Gorge Land Trust — $20,996 · Environment+4 more — $35,091 · Environment
Philanthropy$6,061,913Other$5,526,134International$1,724,900Youth Development$1,026,647Health$624,004Housing & Shelter$556,893Environment$379,301

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,430,494 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAI4ALL — $1,005,179 over 1y, 42% of budgetDISCOVERY INSTITUTE — $962,452 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetVERDE VALLEY SCHOOL — $552,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC — $437,102 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $362,105 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $336,270 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCONSERVATION NW — $237,620 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $225,985 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $187,014 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $180,762 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEAL PALESTINE INC — $163,570 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Life You Can Save — $160,485 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNAMI National — $157,691 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOUBLE UP DRIVE INC — $157,474 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $155,867 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC — $118,351 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN CULTURAL LABORATORY — $106,740 over 1y, 31% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AFRICAN RELIEF AND EDUCATION — $103,691 over 3y, 63% of budgetTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT — $102,122 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $100,830 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $97,670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN WHATCOM COUNTY — $94,335 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC — $88,744 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $85,594 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $82,833 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of York County Inc — $69,032 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NATIONAL SERVICES — $68,740 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE THRIFT STORE INC — $66,726 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $61,702 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $61,702 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps — $61,702 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $61,702 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE — $58,626 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — $58,589 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $54,743 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $51,170 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCharis Ministries — $49,055 over 1y, 53% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $48,542 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND TO REASON — $44,582 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $41,385 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPTA CALIFORNIA CONGRESS OF PARENTS SAN MATEO PARK ELEMENTARY PTA — $37,943 over 2y, 46% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $37,069 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVEDANTA INSTITUTE HOUSTON — $33,617 over 2y, 17% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc — $31,941 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $31,829 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $30,382 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $25,490 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Social Good Fund IncCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Social Good Fund Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Analog Devices Foundation · Habitat for Humanity International Inc · Impactassetsinc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Freewill Impact Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute44% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America22% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • Cabot Performing Arts Center Inc3% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation2% of income from government
  • The Norwalk Art Space Inc1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph