Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freese Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$79kAnimals$44kHuman Services$44kArts & Culture$29kEducation$19kEnvironment$10kHousing & Shelter$9kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA$40,000
TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
WL HUTCHERSON FAMILY YMCA$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,463
TULSA BOTANICAL GARDENS$4,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 9 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$180k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+8%

Still filing today

33%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING CHURCH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $62k
  • TH
    THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA
    2× · 2021–2023 · $43k · revenue 0%
  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $21k · revenue +207%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CT
    CHRIST THE KING PLAYGROUND
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
4
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
5
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
6
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
7
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Greater Tulsa Association of Realtors

The organization operates to promote the Real Estate industry by uniting real estate professionals, promoting and maintaining high standards of conduct in real estate transactions, advancing civil development and economic growth in Tulsa,…

—
10
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
11
Preservation Oklahoma Inc

To preserve the places where Oklahoma history lives.

—
12
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST THE KING CHURCH: $61,500 · OtherCHRIST THE KING CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $15,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTU CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTER: $15,000 · OtherTU CATHOLIC NEWMAN CENTERSALVATION ARMY: $15,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: $10,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE RESURRECTIONCHRIST THE KING PLAYGROUND: $7,000 · OtherTULSA BOTANICAL GARDENS: $6,000 · Other+12 more: $37,287 · Other+12 moreTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $43,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY …THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $20,500 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBRO…TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTO…Clarehouse Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC: $500 · Human ServicesTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTulsa Garden Center: $2,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSigma Chi Foundation: $1,000 · Education
Other$167,287Animals$43,000Arts & Culture$25,500Human Services$8,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Environment$4,000Food & Nutrition$1,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $43,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC: $20,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Garden Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Garden Center ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freese Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freese Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freese Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph