Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Educate the public about the urgency of eliminating discrimination against lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender (lgbt) individuals; provide support to, and coordinate with, other nonprofit organizations with similar programmatic focus.
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Equality Texas works to secure full equality for LGBTQ+ Texans.
As the world's largest lgbtq media advocacy organization, glaad ensures fair, accurate, and inclusive representation that leads to 100% acceptance.
Equalitymaine works to protect and advance full equality for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer mainers by creating an inclusive and intersectional movement through political action, community building, education,…
The organization pursues educational, lobbying, and political activites in otder to further lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgtb)interests within utah.
Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.
Build power, take action and create change to win complete equality and achieve justice for lgbtq people and their families.
Funders for lgbtq issues educates and organizes funders and supports power-building to create an abundance of resources for the justice and liberation of all queer communities.
Movement builder and strategic partner to state-based organizations advocating for lgbtq+ people.
Equalitymaine foundation works to protect and advance full equality for all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer mainers by creating an inclusive and intersectional movement through community building, education, engagement and…
Works to build the grassroots political power of the lgbt community to win complete equality.
Northwest Arkansas Equalitys mission is to provide programming, education and advocacy to serve, connect, and empower the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for Trans Equality Education and the most unlike its peers is National Association of State Chambers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Foundation · Horizons Foundation · Gill Foundation · Arcus Foundation · Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Trevor Project Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pride Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Morton and Barbara
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 474156415 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Freedom for All Americans Education Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.