Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fredrickson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$397kHealth$101kPhilanthropy$87kReligion$65kHousing & Shelter$40kEnvironment$33kArts & Culture$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $120k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELEVATION CHURCH$30,000
QUERENCIA FOUNDATION$15,000
ACHIEVABLE DREAM ACADEMY$15,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH HAMPTON ROADS$15,000
ST MARY'S HOME$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$10,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HONOR FOUNDATION$10,000
NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$7,500
OPERATION SMILE$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
CHRYSLER MUSEUM OF ART$3,500
VIRGINIA ARTS FESTIVAL$3,500
CHOP FOUNDATION$2,000
MOUNTAINTOP MONTESSORI$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNION MISSION: $250 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
PA
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$712k · 16 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
13

Total granted

$712k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+47%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +60%
  • NF
    NAUTICUS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +26%
  • TQ
    The Querencia Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CH
    Children's Hospital of the King's Daughtersgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
4
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
5
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
6
Evms Academic Physicians and Surgeons Health Services Foundation

The evms academic physicians and surgeons health services foundation (the "foundation") exists to further the mission and goals of the eastern virginia medical school ("evms"), a school of medicine within the virginia health sciencces at…

—
7
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
8
University of Virginia Law School Foundation

The university of virginia law school foundation's primary purpose is to receive, manage and expend funds for the benefit of the university of virginia school of law.

Education
9
Norfolk State University Research and Innovation Foundation

To provide brands and services that promote applied research and technological innovations that, in turn, contribute positively to the economic strength of the hampton roads region and the commonwealth of virginia.

Community Improvement
10
Virginia Mason Health System

Advance and support the healthcare and research missions of virginia mason medical center and benaroya research institute at virginia mason through governance oversight of both organizations.

Health
11
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina Foundation Inc

The purpose of the university health systems of eastern carolina foundation (dba ecu health foundation), a non-profit corporation, is to give hope to eastern north carolina and beyond by inspiring philanthropy to improve health, education,…

Health
12
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACHIEVABLE DREAM ACADEMY: $315,000 · OtherACHIEVABLE DREAM ACADEMYELEVATION CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherELEVATION CHURCHST MARY'S HOME: $40,000 · OtherST MARY'S HOMEST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $32,500 · OtherNAUTICUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherTHE HONOR FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $25,000 · Other+17 more: $86,250 · Other+17 moreUnited Way of South Hampton Roads: $45,000 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $20,000 · EducationEastern Virginia Medical School Foundation: $12,500 · EducationNORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC AND SUBSIDIARY: $7,500 · EducationOPERATION SMILE INC: $37,000 · InternationalCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $10,000 · HealthVIRGINIA GENTLEMEN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthThe Querencia Foundation: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$623,750Philanthropy$55,000Education$40,000International$37,000Health$26,000Public Safety & Disaster$25,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of South Hampton Roads: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $37,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAUTICUS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Querencia Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIRGINIA ARTS FESTIVAL INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Virginia Medical School Foundation: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA GENTLEMEN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINTOP MONTESSORI: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION MISSION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of South Hampton Roads ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAUTICUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Querencia Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VIRGINIA ARTS FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Virginia Medical School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters ↗
  • Who funds NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC AND SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GENTLEMEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINTOP MONTESSORI ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Townebank Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fredrickson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fredrickson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fredrickson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph