· Private foundation
Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHABAD UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE | $7,600 |
| WESTPORT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $5,000 |
| LAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC | $4,000 |
| HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC | $4,000 |
| BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER | $4,000 |
| JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC | $4,000 |
| LAWRENCE INTERDENOMINATIONAL | $4,000 |
| LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY | $4,000 |
| ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER | $4,000 |
| ALS ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| ALPHA -1 FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,874 |
| FOUNDATION FOR BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +26%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +36%- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue ×18
Funded once
- IMINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPone grant, 2024 · $3k
- FBFirst Baptist Church of Stilwell Kansasone grant, 2023 · $3k
- FFFURBALL FARM PET SANCTUARYone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.
Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.
Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.
Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…
To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.
To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises
Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.
The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Breakthrough Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
- Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE INTERDENOMINATIONAL NUTRITION K ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MELISSAS MENAGERIES SECOND CHANCES ↗
- Who funds FURBALL FARM PET SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds Saint Lukes Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIPOC FOODWAYS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LUCKY 13 RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds SPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds Reclaim The Records ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds KITTY CITY KANSAS RESCUE INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Douglas County Community Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · J R Albert Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Health Forward Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Kriz Charitable Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.