Skip to content
Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301 at a glance

· Private foundation

Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$64kHealth$34kAnimals$14kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$802k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$7,600
WESTPORT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
LAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC$4,000
JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC$4,000
LAWRENCE INTERDENOMINATIONAL$4,000
HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC$4,000
LAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY$4,000
BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER$4,000
ELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER$4,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$3,000
ALPHA -1 FOUNDATION$3,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,874
FOUNDATION FOR BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK: $500 → 9%Joyful Heart Foundation: $2k → 20%HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $4k → 15%CROSSLINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $500 → 16%INTERFAITH HOSPITALITY NETWORK: $500 → 9%CROSSLINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
DE
KS
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 21 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
17

Total granted

$131k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

62%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +36%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue ×18

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • FB
    First Baptist Church of Stilwell Kansas
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • MO
    METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
2
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
3
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
6
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
7
Humane Society of Jefferson County Inc

The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.

Animals
8
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
9
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
10
Kansas Foodbank Warehouse Inc

To feed the hungry by soliciting and receiving food and other goods from local, regional and national food companies and other enterprises

Food & Nutrition
11
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
12
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Breakthrough Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
16/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $20,200 · OtherCHABAD UNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREKNOX CHURCH PEDICORD-GRIFFITH FUND: $15,000 · OtherKNOX CHURCH PEDICORD-GRIFFITH FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWestport Presbyterian Church for Cherit: $10,000 · OtherWestport Presbyterian Church for CheritWESTPORT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherWESTPORT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherKansas City CARE Clinic: $4,574 · OtherELIZABETH BALLARD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,000 · OtherLAWRENCE INTERDENOMINATIONAL NUTRITION K: $4,000 · OtherJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC: $4,000 · Other+14 more: $29,347 · Other+14 moreALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · HealthALPHA-1 FOUNDA…THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $7,000 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION…AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $6,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LA…Saint Lukes Foundation: $2,000 · HealthSaint Lukes Fo…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,342 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $3,400 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · InternationalLAWRENCE HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsMELISSAS MENAGERIES SECOND CHANCES: $2,500 · AnimalsFURBALL FARM PET SANCTUARY: $2,000 · AnimalsSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $2,000 · AnimalsLUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $2,000 · AnimalsKITTY CITY KANSAS RESCUE INCORPORATED: $1,500 · AnimalsHOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE: $2,000 · Human ServicesJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE ROCHESTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesCROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY LINC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $4,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$119,121Health$24,500International$14,742Animals$14,000Human Services$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,342 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKansas City CARE Clinic: $4,574 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE INTERDENOMINATIONAL NUTRITION K: $4,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetLAWRENCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOMELESS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMELISSAS MENAGERIES SECOND CHANCES: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION COUNTERING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFURBALL FARM PET SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPAY & NEUTER KANSAS CITY D/B/A PET RESOURCE CENTER OF KANSAS CITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY 13 RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSaint Lukes Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITTY CITY KANSAS RESCUE INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE ROCHESTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS-LINES COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Douglas County Commun…The Kansas City Royal…United Way of Greater…J R Albert FoundationMenorah Heritage Foun…Hallmark Corporate Fo…Jewish Community Foun…Health Forward Founda…Midcontinent Foundati…The Sunderland Founda…Kriz Charitable Fund …
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO28.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Douglas County Community Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · J R Albert Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Health Forward Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Kriz Charitable Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frederick Constance Desieghardt 1000000301’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home