· Private foundation
Frederic Scott Bocock & Roberta Bryan Bocock Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE ST CHRISTOPHER'S FUND | $2,000 |
| THE VIRGINIA HOME | $2,000 |
| CAMP PASQUANEY | $2,000 |
| CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS | $1,000 |
| RICHMOND SPCA | $1,000 |
| THE MAXWELTON & LACHIAN FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| JUNIOR BOARD SHELTERING ARMS | $249 |
| MAYMONT FOUNDATION | $249 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +84%
- COCORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +15%
- TPTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- SAST ANDREW'S SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $3k
- NANORTHSTAR ACADEMY INCone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -14%
- SSPCAone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).
Together, we teach and learn skills that foster the courage to discover our voices, develop old and new passions, practice balance in the pursuit of excellence, and collaborate in building vibrant,inclusive, and sustainable communities.
We create opportunities for discovery and reflection by engaging the minds, hands, and hearts of our students.
Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.
The williams school builds with each child the foundation for academic, moral and social success. a williams school student embodies confidence, integrity and a love of learning.
Deerfield academy is an independent secondary school committed to high standards of scholarship, citizenship, and personal responsibility. through a rigorous liberal arts curriculum, extensive co-curricular program, and supportive…
At mercersburg academy we embrace the values of hard work, character, and community while learning to balance independence with interdependence and individual humility with collective pride. our students commit to a life of learning, seek…
Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.
A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."
We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.
Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…
York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Protestant Episcopal High School in Virginia and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF ST TIMOTHY'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAMP PASQUANEY ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
- Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Home ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS ↗
- Who funds NORTHSTAR ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND BALLET ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds THE MAXWELTON AND LACHLAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MENOKIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOSIE KING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELK HILL FARM INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR HORSESHOES YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds MAYMONT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAITH MISSION HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MERWIN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Richard S Reynolds Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · The Harrison Foundation · Massey Family Foundation · Wilbur Moreland Havens Charitable Foundation · Virginia Sargeant Reynolds Foundation · Universal Leaf Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Loupassi Foundation · The Charles M Caravati Foundation Fund · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frederic Scott Bocock & Roberta Bryan Bocock Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.