Skip to content
Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$329kHealth$130kEducation$130kFood & Nutrition$114kHousing & Shelter$109kRecreation & Sports$104kYouth Development$100kEmployment$96kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,928
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODHAVEN$20,000
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$20,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$17,500
STEPHENS COLLEGE$17,000
CALLAWAY COUNTY EXTENDED EMPLOYMENT FOUNDATION$15,928
SENIOR SERVICES OF BOONE CO INC$15,000
COYOTE HILL$15,000
GREAT CIRCLE BOYS & GIRLS TOWN$15,000
IMPACT ACTIVITY CENTER SUMMER SCHOOL RENOVATION$10,000
JOB POINT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COYOTE HILL: $15k → 17%COYOTE HILL: $13k → 17%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 17%COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE: $18k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $40k → 17%UNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $10k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $18k → 17%JOB POINT: $18k → 17%JOB POINT: $15k → 17%JOB POINT: $15k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $14k → 17%JOB POINT: $10k → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$843k · 21 repeat orgs$429k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
28

Total granted

$843k
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+9%

Still filing today

71%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Columbia Center for Urban Agriculture
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +354%
  • VA
    VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER
    4× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +529%
  • JP
    JOB POINT
    4× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GR
    GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CENTRAL MO FISHER HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • TF
    THOMPSON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart of Missouri United Way Inc

The heart of missouri united way works in improve lives of people in need by mobilizing and coordinating the caring power of community resources in mid-missouri.

—
2
Columbia County Community Healthcare Consortium Inc

The mission of the columbia county community healthcare consortium, inc. is improving access to healthcare and supporting the health and well-being of people in our rural community.

Health
3
House Everyone Stl

Our Mission is to solve homelessness as we know it by establishing a pathway for our unhoused neighbors to a home with dignity.

Housing & Shelter
4
Gibson Center for Behavioral Change

The Gibson Center for Behavorial Change is committed to providing comprehensive services which promote new behaviors for a healthy lifestyle.

Health
5
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
6
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

—
8
Help Services of Carroll County

Provide services, food commodities, utility payment funds, cancer treatment funds to low-income residents of the carroll county, missouri area.

Human Services
9
Heart of Missouri Casa

Heart of missouri casa is an organization of volunteer advocates who stand up for abused and neglected children in court to help them find a safe and permanent home.

Crime & Legal
10
Womens Crisis Center of Taney County Inc

The Crisis Center provides shelter and services to victims and their children of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
11
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
12
Restoration House of Greater Kansas City

ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Cerebral Palsy Heartland; the most unlike its peers is Central Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODHAVEN: $50,827 · OtherWOODHAVENSENIOR SERVICES OF BOONE CO INC: $43,500 · OtherSENIOR SERVICES OF BOONE CO INCGREAT RIVERS COUNCIL: $40,000 · OtherGREAT RIVERS COUNCILIN2ACTION: $35,395 · OtherCENTRAL MO DIABETIC CHILDRENS CAMP: $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CENTRAL MO FISHER HOUSE: $30,000 · OtherCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $30,000 · OtherGREAT CIRCLE: $28,109 · OtherTHOMPSON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherRAINBOW HOUSE CHILDREN'S EMERGENCY SHELTER: $23,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC: $25,000 · OtherAUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION: $30,445 · Other+26 more: $286,929 · Other+26 moreJOB POINT: $57,500 · Human ServicesJOB POINTUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $50,000 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY B…Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries: $37,600 · Human ServicesCoyote Hill Foster…Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $36,789 · Human ServicesLove Columbia Corp…COMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE: $18,000 · Human ServicesCOMO MOBILE AID CO…Central Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $70,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA …STEPHENS COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationSTEPHENS …BOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $52,154 · Arts & CultureARROW ROCK LYCEUM THEATRE INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $75,000 · EnvironmentVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $59,501 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentGreat Rivers Council - Boy Scouts of America: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC: $14,000 · Youth Development
Other$678,705Human Services$209,889Education$110,000Arts & Culture$87,154Environment$75,000Philanthropy$59,501Youth Development$51,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColumbia Center for Urban Agriculture: $75,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER: $59,501 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetJOB POINT: $57,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBOONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $52,154 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY BUILDERS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO: $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetSTEPHENS COLLEGE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries: $37,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia: $36,789 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIN2ACTION: $35,395 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetARROW ROCK LYCEUM THEATRE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAUDRAIN COUNTY SHELTER RESOURCE COALITION: $30,445 over 2y, 30% of budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $28,109 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MID MISSOURI INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HELP CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COLUMBIA AREA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMO MOBILE AID COLLECTIVE: $18,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDo Something Right Now Inc: $17,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $16,661 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE MISSOURI HEARTLAND INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISSOURI COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $13,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCentral Missouri Diabetic Childrens Camp Camp Hickory Hill: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCEDAR CREEK THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELCOME HOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHOW-ME CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC: $404 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stafford Family Chari…Veterans United Found…Boone Electric Commun…Allen P and Josephine…Orscheln Industries F…Boone County Communit…Heart of Missouri Uni…Mfa Oil FoundationGriffin Family Founda…Psalm 103 Family Foun…Commerce Bancshares F…Hagan Trust
Stafford Family Charitable TrustMO49.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Boone County Community Trust · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Mfa Oil Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Psalm 103 Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Hagan Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home