Skip to content
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease.

$101M
Granted FY2025still arriving
139
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$38M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$165MScience & Tech$103MEducation$30MSocial Science$7.7MArts & Culture$431kCommunity Improvement$131kPhilanthropy$125kHuman Services$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 139 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 139 grants below total $88,236,398, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,223,693 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,987,295 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $899k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $4.4M
  • $250k+53 grants · $83M
$118,408
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$38,373,117
CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS$7,759,677
DUKE UNIVERSITY$5,298,427
SOCIALISSSIMA LLC$2,993,818
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL$2,699,009
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$1,467,888
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$1,324,417
The Brigham and Women's Hospital Inc$961,992
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$935,523
RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$927,803
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$824,695
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$737,771
FISHER BIOSERVICES$711,717
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$704,171
ACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE$649,555
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TACOMA URBAN LEAGUE: $10k → 9%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT CENTER: $15k → 10%SOUTH PUGET INTERTRIBAL PLANNING: $13k → 11%KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $19k → 9%KOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $17k → 9%NEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $13k → 10%CANCER PATHWAYS: $15k → 9%CANCER PATHWAYS: $13k → 9%NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%NW SARCOMA FOUNDATION A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $10k → 9%EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $30k → 9%EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $15k → 9%CHINESE INFORMATION AND SERVICE: $15k → 9%THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE: $13k → 9%NORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287M · 155 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

155 repeat relationships: 109 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

155
61

Total granted

$287M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+4%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19M · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4.7M · revenue +46%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3.4M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $524k
  • TC
    THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTH DBA ATRIUM HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $328k
  • LB
    LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY
    one grant, 2024 · $310k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
12
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meharry Medical College; the most unlike its peers is Sound Contribution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

161 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 161 of the 247 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
159/161
Grantees still filing
102/161
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $103,764,301 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONSOCIALISSSIMA LLC: $8,200,837 · Other+89 more: $69,576,144 · Other+89 moreCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $25,998,378 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOS…THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7,319,628 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INS…HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,416,942 · HealthHJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INT…SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,507,596 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $2,444,610 · Health+56 more: $21,283,341 · Health+56 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $19,242,983 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,114,390 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEE…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $4,680,180 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHIN…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,130,433 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLU…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $3,183,418 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHES…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,728,711 · EducationEmory University: $2,651,683 · Education+26 more: $14,733,233 · Education+26 moreINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $446,084 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute: $281,878 · Science & TechNORTHWEST FOLKLIFE: $160,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE THEATRE GROUP: $65,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE OUT AND PROUD INC: $21,500 · Arts & CultureEVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST SARCOMA FOUNDATION: $45,500 · Human ServicesKOREAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $35,400 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $27,750 · Human ServicesNEW LIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $27,750 · Human ServicesCancer Pathways: $27,750 · Human ServicesTacoma Urban League: $24,750 · Human ServicesSouth Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation For Research & Education Inc: $90,232 · Public BenefitThe Rand Corporation: $74,328 · Public Benefit
Other$181,541,282Health$65,970,495Education$56,465,031Science & Tech$727,962Arts & Culture$296,500Human Services$248,900Public Benefit$164,560

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS: $25,998,378 over 4y, 69% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $19,242,983 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7,319,628 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,416,942 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,114,390 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $4,680,180 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,130,433 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $3,412,725 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $3,183,418 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $3,023,964 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,728,711 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $2,651,683 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,507,596 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $2,444,610 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,165,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,614,897 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $1,553,577 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,513,936 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC: $1,391,576 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,374,473 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,302,524 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,151,402 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $1,048,063 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE: $1,038,128 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFrontier Science & Technology Research Foundation Inc: $1,021,152 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $1,003,298 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $954,569 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $932,719 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $929,237 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $911,881 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $882,678 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $860,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $843,423 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $843,310 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $833,026 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $797,579 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM: $707,655 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $671,336 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $638,974 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLEN INSTITUTE: $505,863 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $499,829 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $498,614 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $490,855 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY M JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE: $486,959 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $475,002 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: $446,084 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $423,168 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $359,990 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH AND BIOSTATISTICS ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HJF MEDICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fred Hutchinson Cance…The Trustees of Colum…Johns Hopkins Univers…Mayo ClinicVanderbilt University…Seattle Children's Ho…Emory UniversityUniversity of Pittsbu…American Heart Associ…Trustees of Boston Un…Northwestern Universi…Kaiser Foundation Hea…
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterWA110.9× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · Mayo Clinic · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Seattle Children's Hospital · Emory University · University of Pittsburgh · American Heart Association Inc · Trustees of Boston University · Northwestern University · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine: 100% of income from government
  • Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board: 70% of income from government
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 27% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Hjf Medical Research International Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 247 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home