· Private foundation
Fred E & Thelma V Boze Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARAMOUNT HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $17,500 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $17,500 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| PARAMOUNT THEATRE | $10,000 |
| MADISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| GRUENEWALD HISTORIC HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| ANDERSON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PHPARAMOUNT HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $171k · revenue +141%
- MCMADISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY6× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +56%
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC6× · 2018–2023 · $26k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- AUANDERSON UNIVERSITY - STUDENT RETENTION FUNDone grant, 2022 · $15k
- UFUNITED FAITH HOUSING CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
- AUANDERSON UNIVERSITY - CYBER SECURITY CONFERENCEone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
A liberal arts college chartered in 1812, Hamilton College has an enrollment of approximately 2,000 students, representing 50 states and 61 countries, and offers 59 areas of study. Hamilton also offers pre-professional/cooperative programs…
Undergraduate liberal arts education
Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.
Heidelberg university's mission and programs are firmly rooted in liberal arts with innovative coursework in sciences, global education, business and related graduate-level programs. quality education, services to students, a close…
Wabash college is a liberal arts college for men that educates them to think critically, act responsibly, lead effectively, and live humanely.
Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Georgetown college is a fully accredited liberal arts institution of higher learning located in georgetown, kentucky. the college is committed to providing opportunities for excellence in higher learning under christian influences so as to…
The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.
Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anderson University Inc and the most unlike its peers is Anderson Fine Arts Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARAMOUNT HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds MADISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GRUENEWALD HISTORIC HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Hanover College ↗
- Who funds Leadership Academy of Madison County Inc ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED FAITH HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON FINE ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Madison County Community Foundation Inc · Gaither Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fred E & Thelma V Boze Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.