Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred C Rutz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$337kEducation$133kHealth$31kPhilanthropy$13kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$887k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR EV LUTHERAN CHURCH$12,000
NMDP FOUNDATION$10,000
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$9,500
MARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE$9,000
ST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCH$5,500
TRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRIES$4,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY$3,000
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY$2,500
WISCONSIN LUTHERAN CHAPEL$2,000
TIME OF GRACE$2,000
NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS' HOSPITAL$2,000
LUTHERAN MINISTRIES MEDIA INC$2,000
OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION$1,000
ERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP$500
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP: $500 → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $1k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $1k → 8%THE DREAMCATCHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITIES: $500 → 8%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NV
IN
OH
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$506k · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$506k
$2k

Still filing today

23%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +35%
  • OL
    OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +8%
  • WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CT
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY - WALTER A MAIER SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
2
Our Lady of Mercy Life Center

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. our lady of mercy life center is a member of st. peter's health…

—
3
Apostolic Christian Lifepoints Inc

Provide facilities and care for the developmentally disabled

Human Services
4
Able Inc

A b l e , inc (a brighter living experience, inc) is organized to provide residential care for developmentally disabled minnesota residents at its residential and intermediate care facilities located in houston county, minnesota. the…

Human Services
5
Christian Life Resources Inc

The mission of christian life resources is to use life and family issues as bridges to convey the love of god and to share the message of salvation through christ. this organization educates people on what god's word has to say about the…

Religion
6
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
7
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
8
Wellspire Llc

Guided by christian compassion, wellspire supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home.

—
9
Ohio Living Communities

See schedule oohio living communities was founded in 1922 and was incorporated as an ohio non-profit corporation in 1959. the corporation's mission statement is as follows:our mission is to provide older adults with caring and quality…

Human Services
10
Westminster Village Inc

We help people live their lives to the fullest thru the provision of a comprehensive continuum of programs and services. regardless of whether a resident is in independent living, assisted living, memory care, or skilled nursing care, our…

Human Services
11
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
12
Women Doing Well Inc

Women doing well exists to activate women towards greater purposeful generosity. this is accomplished by taking women through the women doing well pathway where they will learn their purpose, identify their passions, and create a plan to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ablelight Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dreamcatcher Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $132,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCHMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGE: $67,500 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER COLLEGEIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $59,500 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCHWISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $46,500 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN SEMINARYST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCH: $26,000 · OtherST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCHWISCONSIN LUTHERAN CHAPEL: $19,000 · OtherTRUTH IN LOVE MINISTRIES: $17,500 · OtherMICHIGAN LUTHERAN SEMINARY: $17,000 · Other+11 more: $80,100 · Other+11 moreOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $13,000 · Human ServicesABLELIGHT INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesDreamcatcher Foundation Inc: $4,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY: $19,000 · ReligionNMDP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyABLELIGHT FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Health
Other$465,100Human Services$24,500Religion$19,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIME OF GRACE MINISTRY: $19,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABLELIGHT INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDreamcatcher Foundation Inc: $4,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIME OF GRACE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ABLELIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds Dreamcatcher Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN LUTHERAN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ABLELIGHT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ERNESTINES DAUGHTER NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thrivent Charitable Impact & InvestingWI21.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Neumann Family Foundation Inc · Ihs Foundation · Holzhueter Foundation · Robert a and Lynn I Doneff Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred C Rutz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred C Rutz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred C Rutz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred C Rutz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred C Rutz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph