Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred and Nancy Sperling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$99kFood & Nutrition$62kHousing & Shelter$45kEducation$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kRecreation & Sports$4kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Stark County Hunger Task Force$15,000
Habitat for Humanity$15,000
Salvation Army$15,000
Thompson Senior Center$12,500
Vermont Foodbank$10,000
The Peddie School$2,500
South Woodstock Fire Protection Assoc$2,000
Lucy Mckenzie Humane Society$1,000
Green Mountain Perkins Academy$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Green Mountain Horse Assoc$1,000
SAM Center$1,000
Lehigh University$1,000
Buckeye Council BSA$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Thompson Senior Center: $28k → 9%Thompson Senior Center: $13k → 9%Thompson Senior Center: $5k → 9%Thompson Senior Center: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$216k · 15 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$216k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+44%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING
    4× · 2022–2025 · $46k · revenue +151%
  • SC
    Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue +40%
  • VF
    VERMONT FOODBANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $17k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army of Canton OH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SA
    Salvation Army of Canton Ohio
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • LM
    Lucy McKenzie Humane Society
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of the Lehigh Valley

Habitat for humanity of the lehigh valley, inc. engages in the construction, rehabilitation, critical home repair, and the sale of housing to economically disadvantaged people on a nonprofit basis in the lehigh valley area of pennsylvania.

Housing & Shelter
2
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
3
Hancock-Hardin-Wyandot-Putnam Community Action Commission

To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…

—
4
Maumee Valley Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. maumee valley habitat for humanity adheres…

—
5
Land Trust of Bucks County

To function as a community-based land conservancy for the preservation of farmland and our agricultural heritages, as well as other open spaces, natural resources, wildlife habitats, and scenic features within bedminster township and other…

Environment
6
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
7
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
8
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
9
Benton Habitat for Humanity

Benton habitat for humanity is a countywide ecumenical ministry that seeks to eliminate substandard housing and to make decent shelter a matter of action and conscience by having people from all income levels work together.

—
10
Golden Harvest Food Bank Inc

Golden harvest food bank, inc.'s mission is "feeding lives together."

Food & Nutrition
11
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
12
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Centre County Inc

Habitat for humanity of greater centre county works in partnership with god and our communities to build simple, decent, affordable houses for qualified families in need of adequate shelter.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity East Central Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Buckeye Council Boy Scouts of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Habitat for Humanity: $25,000 · OtherHabitat for HumanitySalvation Army: $25,000 · OtherSalvation ArmySalvation Army of Canton OH: $10,000 · OtherSalvation Army of Canton OHSalvation Army of Canton Ohio: $10,000 · OtherSalvation Army of Canton OhioSOUTH WOODSTOCK FIRE PROTECTION ASSN INC: $9,000 · OtherSOUTH WOODSTOCK FIRE PROTECTION ASSN INCSAM Center: $8,000 · OtherSAM Center+6 more: $7,050 · Other+6 moreStark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $45,000 · Food & NutritionStark County Hunger Task Forc…VERMONT FOODBANK: $17,000 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODBANKWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $46,000 · Human ServicesWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCI…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT F…The Peddie School: $7,500 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationGREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsLUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · Animals
Other$94,050Food & Nutrition$62,000Human Services$46,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Education$10,500Recreation & Sports$4,000Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING: $46,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetStark County Hunger Task Force Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Peddie School: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKEYE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $350 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODSTOCK AREA COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds The Peddie School ↗
  • Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN HORSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUCY MACKENZIE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKEYE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred and Nancy Sperling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred and Nancy Sperling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred and Nancy Sperling Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph