· Public charity
Frasier Meadows Manor Inc
Build community that inspires and celebrates life.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $10,345,714 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,371,610 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,025,896 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
- $250k+1 grant · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRASIER LIVING INC | $10,195,414 |
| BOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS | $75,300 |
| TRU COMMUNITY CARE | $20,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN MANOR (DBA BOULDER PRESBYTERIAN HOUSING INC) | $20,000 |
| SISTER CARMEN | $20,000 |
| HARVEST OF HOPE PANTRY | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FLFRASIER LIVING INC2× · 2024–2025 · $11M · 100% of their budget
- BHBOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $148k · revenue +189%
- COCITY OF BOULDER3× · 2022–2024 · $60k
Funded once
- DADENTAL AIDone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -9%
- BCBOULDER COUNTY RSVP BOARD INC dba CULTIVATEone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -5%
- FOFriends of the Longmont Senior Centergraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +203%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide affordable and attractive independent living housing for seniors in a neighborhood setting that encourages fellowship and cooperative activities
To provide and promote quality affordable housing and services in a caring environment for older adults in colorado.
The mission statement of Boulder Community Housing Organization is to provide quality, affordable homes and foster thriving communities. They aim to create a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable Boulder by offering affordable housing…
Homeward Pikes Peak empowers individuals and families to access stable housing, increase mental health, recovery, and economic stability.
Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.
Our mission is to promote healthy, vibrant neighborhoods and serve as a first choice for homebuyer resources in Southern Colorado. We have four pillars: educate, build, lend, and engage, that guide us in everything we do. Our HUD-certified…
The seniors' resource center (the organization) is a colorado nonprofit organization and a community partner providing person-focused, coordinated services to enhance independence, dignity and quality of life.
Serving the community by utilizing the skills of senior volunteers and placing them in rewarding opportunities.
Food redistribution- rescue food that would otherwise go to waste and distribute it to low-income communities across Boulder.
To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.
To be the leading provider of affordable housing opportunities for low-to-moderate income households in Greeley/Weld County.
The senior center of boulder city was formed for the purpose of enriching the lives of adults 55 years of age and older in boulder city, nevada by providing quality nutrition and food services, health maintenance, entertainment,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tru Community Care and the most unlike its peers is Boulder Housing Partners Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRASIER LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER HOUSING PARTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENTAL AID ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COUNTY RSVP BOARD INC dba CULTIVATE ↗
- Who funds HARVEST OF HOPE PANTRY ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PRESBYTERIAN HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Longmont Senior Center ↗
- Who funds NEDERLAND AREA SENIORS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · AEC Trust · Nextfifty Initiative · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frasier Meadows Manor Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.