Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank I Lamb Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$107k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$175kEducation$90kHealth$63kAnimals$43kYouth Development$35kEnvironment$30kCrime & Legal$16kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICT$30,000
SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE$25,000
CSU PUEBLO FOUNDATION$20,000
SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS & CONF CENTER$20,000
NATURE & WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF PIKES PEAK REGION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNITY CARE: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 9 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -54% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$307k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-54%

Still filing today

44%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +99%
  • PZ
    PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $35k · revenue +59%
  • NA
    NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SD
    SANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • RM
    ROCKY MTN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOC
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature and Raptor Center of Pueblo

The agency is a conservation Center near Pueblo, CO, where land and people can provide unique experiences in education, conservation and recreation that inspire responsible environmental stewardship.

—
2
Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation Inc

The mission of the Colorado Wildlife Heritage Foundation is to provide a legacy for Colorado through support of environmental stewardship conservation of wildlife and the protection of critical habitat.

Animals
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
5
Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado

To develop and increase charitable giving that connects donors to community needs in Southwest Colorado and to support the nonprofit sector through granting and educational opportunities.

Philanthropy
6
Sangre de Cristo Volunteers for Community Inc

Enrich lives and celebrate nature in southern Colorado

Community Improvement
7
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
8
Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum

To build a lasting connection to the pikes peak region by preserving and sharing our cultural history. this mission is accomplished through our support of the colorado springs pioneers museum, owned and operated by the city of colorado…

Arts & Culture
9
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
10
Grief Center of Southwest Colorado

Grief support to those who have lost a loved one.

Health
11
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
12
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Colorado Community Foundat; the most unlike its peers is Beulah Heritage Preservation League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS & CONF CTR: $105,000 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO ARTS & CONF CTRPUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICT: $30,000 · OtherPUEBLO LIBRARY DISTRICTSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE: $25,000 · OtherSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICESO COLO COMMUNITY FDTN: $20,000 · OtherSO COLO COMMUNITY FDTNROCKY MTN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $20,000 · OtherROCKY MTN COUNCIL BOY SCOUTSCOURT APPOINTED SPEC ADVOC: $16,251 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN COUNCIL BSA: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $102,769 · Other+12 moreBEULAH HERITAGE PRESERVATION LEAGUE: $50,000 · Community ImprovementBEULAH HER…COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationPUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $35,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $1,500 · AnimalsNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $30,000 · EnvironmentSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $25,000 · Human ServicesCare and Share Inc: $15,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$334,020Community Improvement$50,000Education$40,000Animals$36,500Environment$30,000Human Services$25,000Food & Nutrition$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEULAH HERITAGE PRESERVATION LEAGUE: $50,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDAT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEULAH HERITAGE PRESERVATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY- PUEBLO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANGRE DE CRISTO HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDAT ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Southern Colorado Community Foundat · Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Garone-Nicksich Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Ryals Family Foundation · The Bob and Doris Johnston Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank I Lamb Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank I Lamb Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frank I Lamb Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Frank I Lamb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank I Lamb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph