Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank C Diener Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$84kHuman Services$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kArts & Culture$20kPhilanthropy$10kEnvironment$10kReligion$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY IMMACULATE QUEEN SCHOOL$50,000
SAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$40,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$15,000
HANFORD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$10,000
ST ANNE'S CHURCH RIVERDALE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
COLLEGE OF IDAHO$5,000
CANDLELIGHT GUILD$5,000
CRICKET'S HOPE INC$5,000
NAZARETH HOUSE$5,000
TAYLOR'S HEART$5,000
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FRESNO$5,000
CARMEL FATHERS OF SAN JOSE$2,500
NUESTRA SENORA DEL CARMELO$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRICKET'S HOPE INC: $5k → 15%LITTLE BROTHERS-FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $5k → 14%TAYLOR'S HEART: $5k → 14%NK FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%NAZARETH HOUSE FRESNO: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
CA
UT
VA
DE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 15 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
28

Total granted

$1.4M
$204k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+3%

Still filing today

20%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DE
    DIENER EDUCATION FUND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $555k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $240k
  • SJ
    SAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $240k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +166%
  • SA
    ST ALOYSIUS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
2
The California Liver Institute a Nonprofit Corporation

California liver institute mission is to bridge a gap between scientific research, patient and caregiver education and curative individual treatments for people with liver cancer and its causative liver disease.

Health
3
Foundation for the Least Last & Lost of Visalia Inc

Offer free meals and basic clothing on site to the homeless or hungry, provide a place of Christian worship and an opportunity to receive counseling to those persons requesting it. This is all done in a dignified manner. The formal mission…

Human Services
4
American Adoptions of California Dba Family Connection Christian Adoption

Family connections christian adoptions exists to assist the waiting children of the world into permanent, loving families. it is our belief that god's love is best expressed in the family. the work of fcca is a living expression of our…

Unclassified
5
Care Fresno Inc

Care fresno creates safe and healthy communities at high crime apartment complexes, through collaboration with law enforcement, faith-based organizations, and community agencies.

Unclassified
6
Covenant Children's Home Inc

Covenant childrens home is to provide a residence, food and clothing plus a continuum of care including physical, emotional, and spiritual nurturing for neglected, abandoned or abused children.

Human Services
7
Nicole Parker Foundation for Children

The Nicole Parker Foundation for Children is dedicated to helping Children. Funds raised are used to fund organizations who provide comprehensive, high-quality care programs designed for children.

Crime & Legal
8
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Tehachapi

To develop and administer programs designed to assist women and men in confronting and dealing with the physical, emotional, economical, social and spiritual difficulties associated with a crisis pregnancy.

Health
9
Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center

Fresno community hospital and medical center's (fch&mc's) exists to better the lives of all those we serve

Health
10
Calvary Home for Children

The mission of calvary home for children is to provide help, hope, and home to abused and neglected children in upstate south carolina.

Human Services
11
Womens Sober House of Lufkin Inc

The Mantooth House is a Recovery Residence for Chemically Dependent adult women who have successfully completed primary treatment and are in early, but active recovery. We exist to provide quality recovery housing and bridge the gap…

Health
12
Cathedral Home for Children

The mission of Cathedral Home is to enrich the well-being of youth and families. We exist so that every child and family has the resources to thrive. Our agency values are health, access, equity, and compassion.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazareth House of Fresno Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIENER EDUCATION FUND: $555,000 · OtherDIENER EDUCATION FUNDUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $240,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIASAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $240,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOLMARY IMMACULATE QUEEN SCHOOL: $110,000 · OtherMARY IMMACULATE QUEEN SCHOOL+35 more: $383,057 · Other+35 moreBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $52,500 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNAZARETH HOUSE OF FRESNO INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTaylors Heart: $5,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $5,000 · Human ServicesCRICKETS HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNK FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPoverello House: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterThe College of Idaho Inc: $5,000 · EducationCATHOLIC ENGAGED ENCOUNTER OF FRESNO INC: $5,000 · Religion
Other$1,528,057Health$63,500Human Services$22,500Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$5,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $52,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANDLELIGHT GUILD: $15,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLemoore Christian Aid Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetPoverello House: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSE OF FRESNO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC ENGAGED ENCOUNTER OF FRESNO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRICKETS HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetFEDERATION OF ASSOCIATIONS IN BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDLELIGHT GUILD ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Lemoore Christian Aid Inc ↗
  • Who funds Poverello House ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH HOUSE OF FRESNO INC ↗
  • Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds Taylors Heart ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC ENGAGED ENCOUNTER OF FRESNO INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds CRICKETS HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank C Diener Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank C Diener Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frank C Diener Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Frank C Diener Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank C Diener’s filings →

    More from the funding graph