Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank & Betty Hedrick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$120kArts & Culture$53kReligion$21kHealth$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kHuman Services$9kRecreation & Sports$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$551k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$5,000
HIGHLAND PARK GIRLS LACROSSE$1,000
HIGHLAND PARK BOYS LACROSSE$1,000
GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE$250
FIRST TEE FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 16%WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
CO
KS
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 23 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
17

Total granted

$221k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+13%

Still filing today

52%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $64k · revenue +112%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +46%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • WS
    WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +12%
  • WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
2
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
3
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
4
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
5
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
6
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
7
Wichita Foundation

The wichita foundation invests in people and ideas to spark change, and envisions a place where all wichitans thrive and belong. as community conveners, the foundation leads with courage, grows equitable relationships, ignites philanthropy…

Philanthropy
8
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
9
Children's Home Society of South Dakota

Children's home society of south dakota is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing trauma-informed services to children and families impacted by abuse, neglect, domestic violence, and mental health challenges. our mission is to…

Human Services
10
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Wichita Swim Club

The wichita swim club is dedicated to competitive swimming, serving swimmers from all over the wichita and south central kansas area

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Festivals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bradys Bunch Lacrosse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EAST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherEAST HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST CHURCHWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY-ENDOWNMENT: $17,000 · OtherWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY-ENDOWNMENTTOP EARLY LEARNING CENTERS: $5,000 · OtherUNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR: $5,000 · OtherWICHITA TOP CHILDRENS FUND: $4,500 · Other+24 more: $14,950 · Other+24 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $64,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWER…PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $4,100 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING …+1 more: $2,000 · EducationMARK ARTS INC: $51,500 · Arts & CultureMARK ARTS INC+1 more: $1,100 · Arts & CultureST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $13,000 · Human ServicesWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1,000 · Human ServicesRAISE MY HEAD FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesHIGHLAND PARK GIRLS LACROSSE: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentHIGHLAND PARK BOY'S LACROSSE INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentWICHITA FESTIVALS INC: $850 · Recreation & Sports
Other$105,450Education$70,100Arts & Culture$52,600Health$16,000Human Services$14,500Youth Development$2,000Recreation & Sports$850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARK ARTS INC: $51,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA TOP CHILDRENS FUND: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $4,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FESTIVALS INC: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAGEWAYS LTD: $700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAISE MY HEAD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH HORIZONS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER PLACE INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBradys Bunch Lacrosse: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARK ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA TOP CHILDRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK GIRLS LACROSSE ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK BOY'S LACROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FESTIVALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PASSAGEWAYS LTD ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISE MY HEAD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Belin Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Ima Foundation · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank & Betty Hedrick Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank & Betty Hedrick Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Frank & Betty Hedrick Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Frank & Betty Hedrick Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank & Betty Hedrick’s filings →

    More from the funding graph