Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$250k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$396kEducation$235kReligion$131kFood & Nutrition$130kYouth Development$123kArts & Culture$119kHealth$53kPhilanthropy$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $194k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA$20,000
WVNCC FOUNDATION INC$15,000
APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC$15,000
BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION$15,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$15,000
NORTH WHEELING COMM YOUTH CENTER$15,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
FAMILY SERVICES UPPER OHIO VALLEY$15,000
YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC$15,000
SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELIN$13,000
SALVATION ARMY WHEELING$11,000
OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK$10,000
LAUGHLIN MEMORIAL CHAPEL$10,000
UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY$10,000
HOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - FOOD$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $354k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $6k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $20k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $15k → 18%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $5k → 18%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $4k → 18%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $15k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $4k → 18%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $4k → 18%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $3k → 18%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $3k → 18%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $15k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $3k → 18%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $15k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $12k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $12k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $11k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $10k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $10k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $7k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $4k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $3k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $3k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $2k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $2k → 15%THE LIFE HUB: $2k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $2k → 15%OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $2k → 15%RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES: $2k → 15%THE LIFE HUB: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 30 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
6

Total granted

$1.2M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

63%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $114k · revenue +125%
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $92k · revenue +28%
  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY AMAZING RAISE LOCAL INCENTITIV
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • BL
    BUCKEYE LOCAL SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • MA
    MOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
3
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
4
Family Service of Marion & Harrison Counties Inc

To provide personal care and counseling services for the development of wholesome family life

Human Services
5
The Food Pantry Network of Licking County

Distribution of food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meal delivery service to seniors and adult day program participants.

Food & Nutrition
7
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels of greater lynchburg addresses the hunger, isolation, and unique needs of the homebound. driven by volunteers who embody compassionate care, meals on wheels strengthens our community by delivering hot, nutritious meals,…

—
8
Meals on Wheels of Hamilton County

Mowhc supports individuals who are elderly, disabled, and homebound by delivering nutritious meals, reducing hunger, improving health and promoting independence.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals On Wheels Inc

Meals on wheels is the leading privately funded organization promoting dignity and independent living for the homebound, through volunteer delivery of nutritious meals in the greater indianapolis area.

Food & Nutrition
10
Whole Life Services Inc

Whole life services, inc.'s daily operations are motivated by and driven by persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (id/dd), their families, and others in the community supporting their lives. in order to empower people to…

Human Services
11
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc

Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
12
Charles County Harc Inc

Provide residential and human services to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mountaineer Autism Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WVNCC FOUNDATION INC: $118,800 · OtherWVNCC FOUNDATION INCWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $114,000 · OtherWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $58,500 · OtherTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INCSALVATION ARMY WHEELING: $57,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY WHEELINGFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $50,500 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INCST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $43,750 · OtherST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $40,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH - FOOD: $37,750 · OtherLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $35,000 · OtherTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $33,000 · OtherNORTH WHEELING COMM YOUTH CENTER: $31,000 · OtherCATHOLIC NEGHBORHOOD CENTER - COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $28,750 · Other+10 more: $69,450 · Other+10 moreYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $92,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INCTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $76,900 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $62,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINI…APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INCFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INCRUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesOHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $15,000 · Human Services+2 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesBELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $117,000 · EducationBELMONT CO…WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $34,100 · HealthMOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT: $2,000 · HealthMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $17,250 · Food & NutritionUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $3,800 · PhilanthropyCHANGE INC: $4,000 · Employment
Other$718,000Human Services$353,900Education$117,000Health$36,100Food & Nutrition$17,250Philanthropy$16,300Employment$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $117,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $114,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $92,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $76,900 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $62,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $58,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $50,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $41,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $41,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $35,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $34,100 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $33,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $17,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK: $15,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE HUB INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHANGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HEROES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELMONT COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL NESBITT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE HUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER AUTISM PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable TrustWV34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Vna Home Support Services Inc · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · Helping Hand Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph