Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francis Beidler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
94
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.9MHealth$911kYouth Development$640kArts & Culture$621kCrime & Legal$561kReligion$498kEducation$441kHuman Services$348kOther$0
02FY2025 · 94 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k73 grants · $220k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $376k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $127k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$3,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER$285,000
CHICAGO YOUTH CENTERS$77,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$45,000
CHICAGO CHILDRENS MUSEUM$40,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
GIRLS PLAY SPORTS$27,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$25,000
BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOC$23,000
CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN$21,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ERIE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$19,000
EVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL HEALTH CENTER$18,000
PUBLIC INTEREST LAW INITIATIVE$18,000
PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CASA CENTRAL: $3k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $21k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $3k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $6k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $6k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $6k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $6k → 14%CENTER FOR DOMESTIC PEACE: $6k → 14%CHILDREN ADVOCATES FOR CHANGE: $5k → 14%CHILDREN ADVOCATES FOR CHANGE: $5k → 14%CHILDREN ADVOCATES FOR CHANGE: $5k → 14%VOICES FOR ILLINOIS CHILDREN: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR ILLINOIS CHILDREN: $3k → 14%VOICES FOR ILLINOIS CHILDREN: $3k → 14%KUUMBA EVANSTON: $15k → 14%KUUMBA EVANSTON: $12k → 14%KUUMBA EVANSTON: $5k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRENS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRENS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%EVANSTON SCHOOL CHILDRNS CLOTHING ASSN: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
VA
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 120 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

120 repeat relationships: 89 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
18

Total granted

$6.6M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+69%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +120%
  • CY
    Chicago Youth Centers
    8× · 2018–2025 · $534k · revenue +46%
  • PI
    Public Interest Law Initiative
    8× · 2018–2025 · $233k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • NC
    NAT'L CENTER ON POVERTY LAW S SHRIVER
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • AL
    AIR LIFE LINE OF THE MIDWEST
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • HA
    HEARTLAND ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
2
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
3
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
4
Chicago Children's Advocacy Center

The chicago children's advocacy center unites public, private, and community partners to ensure the safety, health, and well-being of abused children.

Crime & Legal
5
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
6
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
7
Advocates for Illinois Children

Improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes in public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and community outreach.

Human Services
8
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
9
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
11
Tutoring Chicago

Tutoring chicago delivers the power of education through one-to-one tutoring.

Arts & Culture
12
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Youth Centers; the most unlike its peers is Equity & Empowerment for Evanston Families. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/72
Grantees still filing
54/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $291,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY: $200,000 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETYWBEZ CHICAGO PUBLIC RADIO: $117,500 · OtherSTART EARLY: $110,000 · Other+105 more: $2,300,450 · Other+105 moreTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $1,458,500 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION …+2 more: $23,000 · Civil RightsChicago Youth Centers: $533,500 · Youth DevelopmentChicago Y…+2 more: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC: $196,000 · Public BenefitBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $193,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $8,000 · Public BenefitChicago Children's Museum: $320,000 · Arts & CultureSHOREFRONT NFP: $21,000 · Arts & CultureGLESSNER HOUSE MUSEUM: $16,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $18,000 · Arts & CulturePublic Interest Law Initiative: $233,000 · Crime & LegalALL OUR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $55,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $34,000 · Crime & LegalGreater Chicago Legal Clinic: $29,000 · Crime & LegalCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $77,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $37,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR ADVANCING DOMESTIC PEACE: $36,000 · Human ServicesEQUITY & EMPOWERMENT FOR EVANSTON FAMILIES: $32,000 · Human ServicesEvanston School Children's Clothing Assn: $28,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S ADVOCATES FOR CHANGE: $24,000 · Human ServicesCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $18,000 · Human ServicesSARAH'S INN: $18,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $16,000 · Human ServicesCenter on Halsted: $16,000 · Human Services+1 more: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$3,258,950Civil Rights$1,481,500Youth Development$541,500Public Benefit$397,000Arts & Culture$390,000Crime & Legal$351,000Human Services$326,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $1,458,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $533,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetChicago Children's Museum: $320,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPublic Interest Law Initiative: $233,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC: $196,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $193,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSTART EARLY: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS PLAY SPORTS INC NFP: $86,000 over 8y, 39% of budgetErie Family Health Center Inc: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $77,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $72,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALL OUR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $55,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetThe Family Institute: $47,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGateway Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY FOCUS LEGACY: $37,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR ADVANCING DOMESTIC PEACE: $36,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMETROSQUASH NFP: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLEGAL AID CHICAGO: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI FLORIDA INC: $32,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetNAMI PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $32,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetEQUITY & EMPOWERMENT FOR EVANSTON FAMILIES: $32,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetGreater Chicago Legal Clinic: $29,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC: $29,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEvanston School Children's Clothing Assn: $28,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetCHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN: $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCATES FOR CHANGE: $24,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH & OPPORTUNITY UNITED INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $22,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $21,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHOREFRONT NFP: $21,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASA CENTRAL SOCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION HOUSE OF CHICAGO: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetChildcare Network of Evanston: $17,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGLESSNER HOUSE MUSEUM: $16,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARKS PRESERVATION COUNCIL OF ILLINOIS: $16,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH JOB CENTER INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cradle Society: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Guidance: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEVANSTONSKOKIE DISTRICT 65 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION (FOUNDATION 65): $14,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetILLINOIS COUNCIL AGAINST HANDGUN VIOLENCE: $12,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Children's Museum ↗
  • Who funds Public Interest Law Initiative ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS PLAY SPORTS INC NFP ↗
  • Who funds Erie Family Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds ALL OUR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Family Institute ↗
  • Who funds Gateway Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FOCUS LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ADVANCING DOMESTIC PEACE ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL43.2× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Elizabeth Beidler Tisdahl Foundation · The Kellcie Fund · Evanston Community Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Circle of Service Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Northwestern University · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francis Beidler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francis Beidler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Francis Beidler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Francis Beidler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Francis Beidler’s filings →

More from the funding graph