Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francesco a Mascaro Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$3.0MAnimals$2.0MReligion$722kEducation$302kHuman Services$282kArts & Culture$273kHealth$235kPublic Safety & Disaster$126kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $437k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $471k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARA$300,000
BIRDSBORO MEMORIAL FUND$158,075
Individual grant recipient$143,310
Individual grant recipient$109,428
EXETER LIBRARY$60,000
MENNONITE HERITAGE CENTER$40,000
PENN MEDICINE$40,000
VISITATION BVM$30,000
METHACTON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ST ANN'S CHURCH$25,000
HOLY CROSS REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOL$23,986
DEVON PREPARATORY SCHOOL$20,000
ARC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$20,000
PENN MEDICINE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BURGER KING MCLAMORE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%BURGER KING MCLAMORE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 15%LIZ'S BIRTHDAY CLOSET: $250 → 6%EXETER COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%EXETER COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 39 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
57

Total granted

$6.0M
$737k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+7%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $366k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NZ
    NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +141%
  • LJ
    LOUIS J MASCARO FOUNDATION INC DBA MASCARO AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM
    4× · 2017–2023 · $559k · revenue +192% · 100% of their budget
  • JM
    JP MASCARO & SONS CHARITABLE TRUST
    2× · 2019–2024 · $365k · revenue +26% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN NEUMANN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $120k
  • ME
    METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -11% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—
2
The Mifflintown Hose Co No 1

Fire company provides volunteer fire services to three municipalites in juniata county, pa.; it also provides rescue, safety and prevention to all of juniata county.

—
3
East Petersburg Fire Company No 1

To prevent, fight and extinguish destructive fires in order to safeguard the borough of east petersburg, lanc. co., pa and its surrounding communities

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Lancaster Township Fire Department

The mission of the lancaster township fire department is to serve the community by protecting lives,property and the environment in a safe, efficient and professional manner. the fire department is responsible for extinguishing fires, fire…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Lawrence Park Volunteer Fire Department

Providing emergency, safety and fire services to lawrence park township pennsylvania.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Philadelphia Steam Fire Engine No 1

To provide fire and rescue services in the borough of pottstown, montgomery county pa. the entity also has a social room that is not open to the general public.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Upper Saucon Vol Fire Dept No 1

Fire & Rescue Company

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Mt Penn Fire Company

Volunteer fire fighting

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Pennsylvania Society of Sons of the Revolution
—
10
Mercersburg Montgomery Peters & Warren Volunteer Fire and Ambulance

Mmp&w volunteer fire and ambulance company provides fire, rescue, and ambulance service to the citizens of mercersburg and the three surrounding rural townshiops in pennsylvania. it serves all the citizens in a 157 square mile first due…

—
11
Pocono Mountain Regional Emergency Medical Services

Provide emergency ambulance services

Health
12
Pennsburg Fire Company No 1

To maintain fire control protection for the residents of pennsburg boro and surronding communities

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight for Lives; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Exeter Township Police Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
27/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARA: $830,000 · OtherMARAIndividual grant recipient: $524,310 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAINT JOHN NEUMANN SOCIETY: $200,000 · OtherBIRDSBORO MEMORIAL FUND: $158,075 · OtherST TERESA OF CALCUTTA: $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $130,328 · Other+88 more: $1,796,241 · Other+88 moreNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,000,000 · AnimalsNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY+1 more: $6,000 · AnimalsLOUIS J MASCARO FOUNDATION INC DBA MASCARO AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM: $559,011 · PhilanthropyLOUIS J MASCARO …JP MASCARO & SONS CHARITABLE TRUST: $365,000 · PhilanthropyJP MASCARO & SON…THE ARC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $90,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ARC ALLIANCE…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE: $130,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $4,500 · HealthMETHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationTHE GESU SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationLOWER PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationColebrookdale Railroad Preservation Trust: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBERKS MILITARY HISTORY MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMONTGOMERY THEATER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER NORRISTOWN SOCIETY FOR THE ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHEALING TREE CO: $5,000 · Arts & Culture1ST STREET PLAYERS: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHOPE FOR THE CHILDREN INC: $40,000 · Religion
Other$3,778,954Animals$2,006,000Philanthropy$1,015,011Health$139,500Education$117,000Arts & Culture$50,000Religion$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $2,000,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetLOUIS J MASCARO FOUNDATION INC DBA MASCARO AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM: $559,011 over 4y, 100% of budgetJP MASCARO & SONS CHARITABLE TRUST: $365,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetPILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE: $130,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetMETHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE ARC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetWESTERN BERKS AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION: $80,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE FOR THE CHILDREN INC: $40,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetHTC TTEE BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND FBO WCC 8370000: $40,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE AREA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetBURGER KING FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBERKS MILITARY HISTORY MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetAMITY FIRE COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPottstown Cluster of Religious Communiti: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GESU SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMuhlenberg Community Library: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMONTGOMERY THEATER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPENRYN FIRE COMPANY 1 INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBEST BUDDIES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetBlazers Youth Sports Incorporated: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRUNNERVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLOWER PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEALING TREE CO: $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetPERSEVERANCE VOLUNTEER FIRE CO NO 1: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetComcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXETER COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON FIRE COMPANY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPENN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTEGRATE FOR GOOD INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINGLIS HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Michael Petrone Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDREW UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEMARSH TOWNSHIP LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEUMANN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAT ALL-STARS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOTTSTOWN REGIONAL PUBLIC LIBRARY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LOUIS J MASCARO FOUNDATION INC DBA MASCARO AUTOMOBILE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds JP MASCARO & SONS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS OF LIGHT AND LOVE ↗
  • Who funds METHACTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN BERKS AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HTC TTEE BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND FBO WCC 8370000 ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIXVILLE AREA POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Colebrookdale Railroad Preservation Trust ↗
  • Who funds BURGER KING FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jp Mascaro & Sons Charitable TrustPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jp Mascaro & Sons Charitable Trust · Berks County Community Foundation Inc · Pasquale & Susan Lee Mascaro Charitable Trust · Pottstown Regional Community Foundation Fka Pottstown Area Health and Wellness · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francesco a Mascaro Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francesco a Mascaro Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Drew University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Francesco a Mascaro Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Francesco a Mascaro Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Francesco a Mascaro’s filings →

More from the funding graph