Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francesca Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$44kFood & Nutrition$11kReligion$5kInternational$4kHealth$4kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
6
States reached
$612k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY$5,500
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$5,000
FOOD HELPERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$2,000
WESTMORELAND FOOD BANK$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,500
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$1,000
PRIESTS OF THE SCARED HEART$1,000
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$1,000
THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$1,000
THE CHILDRENS INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$750
ST JOSEPH HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY$750
BROTHERS BROTHER FOUNDATION$750
BETHLEHEM HAVEN$750
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF PITTSBURGH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VERLAND FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%VERLAND FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%VRELAND FOUNDATION: $300 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $750 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $500 → 11%BETHLEHEM HAVEN: $400 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$66k · 22 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$66k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-14%

Still filing today

59%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +11%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +11%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -14%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
8
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREIndividual grant recipient: $5,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOOD HELPERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $4,000 · OtherFOOD HELPERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTYWESTMORELAND FOOD BANK: $4,000 · OtherWESTMORELAND FOOD BANKLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2,700 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORPRIESTS OF THE SCARED HEART: $2,000 · OtherST JOSEPH HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY: $1,650 · Other+7 more: $5,250 · Other+7 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBUR…ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGETHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $2,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITU…PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $1,750 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $1,000 · InternationalBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $1,650 · Human ServicesVERLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 · Human ServicesGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $2,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health
Other$46,300Education$15,500Housing & Shelter$5,500International$4,250Human Services$2,950Food & Nutrition$2,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $2,700 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH: $1,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVERLAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds BROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds VERLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Massey Charitable TrustPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Massey Charitable Trust · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francesca Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francesca Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Francesca’s filings →

More from the funding graph