Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frances & Cooper Morrison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$347kPhilanthropy$251kCommunity Improvement$100kEducation$45kAnimals$42kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$42,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$669k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St James Episcopal Church$42,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 11%CROSSWAY CHURCH: $5k → 20%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $25k → 23%CROSSWAY CHURCH: $5k → 20%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $10k → 23%MILLSAPS COLLEGE: $5k → 23%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42k → 23%St James Episcopal Church: $42k → 23%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42k → 23%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42k → 23%ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $42k → 23%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 23%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI: $100k → 23%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $50k → 23%ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL: $42k → 23%GREATER BELHAVEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Frances & Cooper Morrison Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MS; by stated purpose, 87%.

Frances & Cooper Morrison Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 4 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$345k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
0%

Still filing today

25%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $210k
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $85k
  • Millsaps College
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue -7%

Funded once

  • HE
    HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +185%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $210,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCHCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL: $85,000 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CATHEDRALCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL: $42,000 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPALST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CAT: $42,000 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CAT+3 more: $15,575 · OtherHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRIS…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI: $100,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUN…Millsaps College: $40,000 · EducationOPERATION SHOESTRING INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$544,575Community Improvement$100,000Philanthropy$100,000Education$40,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMillsaps College: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SHOESTRING INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds Millsaps College ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SHOESTRING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for MississippiMS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Mississippi · Kathryn & Julian Wiener Fund · Selby and Richard McRae Foundation · Walker Foundation · Mississippi Humanities Council Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frances & Cooper Morrison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances & Cooper Morrison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frances & Cooper Morrison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph