Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Foxman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$434k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$305k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$2.3MScience & Tech$305kReligion$200kHuman Services$84kEducation$45kArts & Culture$16kEnvironment$6kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
  • $250k+1 grant · $305k
$74,215
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ElNet$305,000
Jewish United Fund$74,215
Individual grant recipient$36,000
Chabad of N Broward County$18,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving66% of grant dollars ($2.6M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 34% that went abroad ($1.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Journeys The Road Home: $250 → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
FL

Beyond the US34% of all-years giving ($1.3M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$1.3M · 9 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 12 repeat orgs$973k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
37

Total granted

$2.9M
$937k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+17%

Still filing today

8%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +13%
  • E
    ElNet
    6× · 2017–2025 · $848k
  • NS
    North Shore Synagogue Beth El
    2× · 2020–2024 · $124k

Funded once

  • JJ
    JUF - Jewish United Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $248k
  • F
    Felnet
    one grant, 2019 · $186k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $165k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
3
Jewish Community Centers of Chicago

JCC Chicago is building community, supporting individuals and families, and growing hope through Jewish connections for everyone.

Human Services
4
Chicago Chesed Fund

To raise and distribute funds, goods, food, and assistance to the poverty-stricken in the jewish community.

Human Services
5
Champaign-Urbana Jewish Federation

The federation supports a variety of jewish projects and causes with the goals of fostering meaningful and vibrant jewish life at home and abroad and assisting broader humanitarian activities.

Religion
6
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
7
Covenant House Chicago
8
Jewish Council on Urban Affairs

The Jewish Council on Urban Affair's (JCUA) longstanding mission is to combat poverty, racism and antisemitism working in partnership with diverse communities. JCUA uses a community organizing model to engage the Jewish community in the…

Community Improvement
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Jewish Child and Family Services

JCFS Chicago services and programs support wellbeing for children, teens, adults and families regardless of race, culture, religion, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, or…

Human Services
11
Chabad of River North and Fulton Market

Chabad of River North and Fulton Market is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and chartable needs of the Jewish Community and /or of the neighbors of River North and Fulton Market.

Religion
12
University of Judaism Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pads to Hope Dba-Journeys the Road Home and the most unlike its peers is Cool Clothes Closet of South Palm Beach County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ElNet — $847,750 · OtherElNetJUF - Jewish United Fund — $247,749 · OtherJUF - Jewish United FundFelnet — $186,000 · OtherFelnetIndividual grant recipient — $164,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNorth Shore Synagogue Beth El — $124,130 · OtherNorth Shore Synagogue Beth ElFriends of Elnet — $124,000 · OtherFriends of ElnetIndividual grant recipient — $105,400 · OtherCool Clothes Closet of South Palm Beach County Inc — $84,000 · Other+35 more — $241,011 · Other+35 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,751,853 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,510 · EducationLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthPADS Lake County Inc — $500 · HealthChicago Symphony Orchestra — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePADS TO HOPE DBA-JOURNEYS THE ROAD HOME — $250 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $150 · Human Services
Other$2,124,540Philanthropy$1,751,853Education$5,510Health$1,500Arts & Culture$1,000Human Services$400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $1,751,853 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds Cool Clothes Closet of South Palm Beach County Inc
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds PADS Lake County Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foxman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph