Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fox Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$40kHealth$38kHuman Services$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$15kHousing & Shelter$15kCrime & Legal$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$802k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Bank of Central Eastern NC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Mother Hubbard's Cupboard$5,000
MUSC Foundation$5,000
Kids Making It Inc$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Presbyterian Disaster Assistance$3,500
Episcopal Relief Development$3,500
NHRMC Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Lower Cape Fear Lifecare: $5k → 12%Lower Cape Fear Lifecare: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 10 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
19

Total granted

$128k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+23%

Still filing today

50%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Carousel Center Inc
    3× · 2019–2023 · $15k · revenue +72%
  • DO
    DREAMS OF WILMINGTON INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • AS
    A Safe Place Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $13k · revenue +205%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • CF
    CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • FF
    FIRST FRUIT MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
2
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
3
Brunswick County Habitat for Humanity Incorporated

To provide low-cost housing for those in need in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
4
Cumberland County Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

—
5
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
6
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
7
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
8
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
9
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
10
Coastal Harvest

Feed the hungry and assist our partner agencies free of charge.

Human Services
11
Wnc Health Network Inc

WNC Health Network, Inc supports people and organizations to improve community health and wellbeing across Western North Carolina.

Health
12
Charleston Habitat for Humanity Inc

Charleston Habitat for Humanitys (CHFH) vision is a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Seeking to put God's love into action, Charleston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. By…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of North Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Wrightsville Beach Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Food Bank of Central Eastern NC: $25,000 · OtherFood Bank of Central Eastern NCMother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc: $10,000 · OtherMother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington IncIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEvery Age Foundation Eldehaus Campu: $10,000 · OtherEvery Age Foundation Eldehaus CampuNC Community Foundation: $10,000 · OtherNC Community FoundationST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+21 more: $94,500 · Other+21 moreThe Carousel Center Inc: $15,000 · HealthThe Carou…ST MARY DENTAL CLINIC CORP: $5,000 · HealthST MARY D…DREAMS OF WILMINGTON INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureLower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesA Safe Place Inc: $13,000 · Crime & LegalCAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterFIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES: $5,000 · Religion
Other$169,500Health$20,000Arts & Culture$15,000Human Services$15,000Crime & Legal$13,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Carousel Center Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDREAMS OF WILMINGTON INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetA Safe Place Inc: $13,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVigilant Hope Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST MARY DENTAL CLINIC CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNourishNC Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetELDERHAUS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWRIGHTSVILLE BEACH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS MAKING IT INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Carousel Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREAMS OF WILMINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds A Safe Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mother Hubbard's Cupboard of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare ↗
  • Who funds CAPE FEAR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Vigilant Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY DENTAL CLINIC CORP ↗
  • Who funds NourishNC Inc ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHAUS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds KIDS MAKING IT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hanover Community Endowment IncNC30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hanover Community Endowment Inc · Cape Fear Memorial Foundation · The Landfall Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc · The Lagomarsino Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Myrtle and Rt Sinclair Jr Charitable Foundation Inc · The Eshelman Foundation · Corning Incorporated Foundation · The Talbert Family Foundation · The Rudisill Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fox Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fox Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fox Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fox Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fox’s filings →

    More from the funding graph