· Private foundation
Fournier Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MAINE FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| TOWER THEATRE | $5,000 |
| STREET DOG HERO | $5,000 |
| BIG RIVER COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CENTRAL OREGON TRAIL ALLIANCE | $3,000 |
| BETHLEHEM INN | $2,500 |
| DESCHUTES COUNTY SEARCH RESCUE | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SDSTREET DOG HERO6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +241%
- BIBETHLEHEM INN9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +27%
- COCentral Oregon Trail Alliance9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +574%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Maineone grant, 2017 · $5k
- BTBetter Togetherone grant, 2017 · $2k
- OHOR HUMANE SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.
Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…
To improve the lives of companion animals by providing humane individualized care and a chance to know the comforts of a loving home through advocacy education and support of those in need.
To help homeless small animals in the state of Oregon by providing adequate shelter and veterinary care.
OCCRA is a volunteer network that rescues and transports sick and injured wildlife in the North Willamette Watershed District to licensed care facilities on behalf of those members of the public who face transportation and safety…
The mission of Thrive Hood River is to protect Hood River's farmland, forests, and wild places and the livability of its cities and rural communities.
The pacific crest trail association's mission is to advocate for the pacific crest trail as an inspirational outdoor experience, to connect people to the pct, and to conserve the trail.
To defend and plan for central oregons livable future
Evergreen's mission is to create, maintain, and protect sustainable mountain biking opportunities in Washington State.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
- Who funds STREET DOG HERO ↗
- Who funds Deschutes County Search and Rescue Foundation ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds Central Oregon Trail Alliance ↗
- Who funds Big River Community Land Trust ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Better Together Central Oregon ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA GORGE WIND AND WATER ASSOC ↗
- Who funds FURNISH HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
- Who funds HIGH DESERT CHAMBER MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND MOUNTAIN RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Ethos Inc ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARTICHOKE COMMUNITY MUSIC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DE LAS AMERICAS PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Anjulicia Foundation · Dziuban Foundation · James F & Marion L Miller Foundation · The Collins Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fournier Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
- Ethos Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Artichoke Community Music — 7% of income from government
- High Desert Chamber Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- Central Oregon Trail Alliance — 1% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.