· Private foundation
Fountain of Grace Mission
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOD WILL PROVIDE ASSOCIATION | $4,500 |
| BETH-EL MESSIANIC CONGREGATION | $3,900 |
| MERCIFUL SAMARITAN | $2,301 |
| MODERN DAY MISSIONS | $1,600 |
| MODERN DAY MISSIONS | $1,000 |
| THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| PRAISE PRAYER LANKA CHURCH | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| TRANSFORMING NATIONS | $300 |
| CHRISTIAN MISSION EBENEZER | $300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 73% of grant dollars ($116k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($43k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 27% of all-years giving ($43k)
7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 6% of Fountain of Grace Mission’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GWGOD WILL PROVIDE3× · 2018–2022 · $23k
- HBHILLCREST BAPTIST CHURCH4× · 2018–2022 · $15k
- GWGod Will Provide Association2× · 2023–2024 · $10k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
- AOArk of God Canadaone grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support missionary work and helping needy
Missionary work in the nation of India
Mission work in ukraine, india, nepal and bhutan.
Humanitarian Relief for Internally Displaced Persons in Ukraine
we provide missionary services to needy families in the United States and all over the Former USSR, to help them stay true to GOD.
Our organization was born out of compassion, love and mercy towards people. It is made up of immigrants from Ukraine, who are passionate about helping those suffering the most in our home country of Ukraine. In addition to fundraising, we…
Assisting individuals in Romania and Ukraine with food, clothing, and other personal care supplies.
Serve orphans, elderly, refugees and the poor.
assisting orphans and missionary in need
Relief for the poor, the distressed, or the underprivileged. Helping people who are in difficult circumstances with food, medicine, education, and other essential needs.
Supporing missionaries worldwide
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Fountain of Grace Mission funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fountain of Grace Mission. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Fountain of Grace Mission’s filings →