Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne Inc

The organization's mission is to provide research grants to fund aggressive research into treatments for duchenne muscular dystrophy and to support the effort to treat, and ultimately cure, this disease.

$602k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.7M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 7 grants below total $410,124 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $602,274 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $192,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $338k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE$101,000
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEART CENTER$100,000
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY$86,860
PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY$50,000
OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY$27,055
OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$20,209
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $410k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $100k → 7%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $50k → 7%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $35k → 7%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $30k → 7%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $20k → 7%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $50k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $50k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $50k → 14%PARENT PROJECT MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
WV
VA
MD
DC
GA

Grants abroad, by region — $191k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Austria$100k · 52% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO FUND RESEARCH FOR THE TREATMENT OF DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY

North America (Canada and Mexico)$91k · 48% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO FUND RESEARCH FOR THE TREATMENT OF DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 8 repeat orgs$862k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$2.9M
$547k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+65%

Still filing today

88%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $641k · revenue +73%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    6× · 2017–2025 · $603k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $503k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $151k · revenue +65%
  • VH
    VCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS
    one grant, 2024 · $114k
  • BS
    BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $91k · revenue +108%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
11
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $602,627 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $343,818 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State Unive…FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $233,700 · EducationFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW Y…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $151,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTEREmory University — $90,000 · EducationEmory University+1 more — $27,055 · EducationCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $640,846 · HealthCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTECHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $503,498 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $201,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONALOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC — $410,000 · Human ServicesTHE PARENT P…VCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS — $113,703 · OtherVCUVCU HEA…REVERAGEN BIOPHARMA INC — $97,852 · OtherREVERAGEN …STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON — $86,860 · OtherSTATE UNIV…BINGHAMPTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherBINGHAMPTO…TRINDS LLC — $11,526 · OtherBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC — $91,153 · InternationalMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $65,000 · Community Improvement
Education$1,448,200Health$1,395,344Human Services$410,000Other$334,941International$91,153Community Improvement$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $640,846 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $602,627 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $503,498 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PARENT PROJECT FOR MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY RESEARCH INC — $410,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $343,818 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $233,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $201,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $151,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC — $91,153 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEmory University — $90,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION — $65,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $27,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph