Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Foundation for Those Without a Voic

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$175k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

81% of Foundation for Those Without a Voic’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Arizona Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Foundation for Those Without a Voic named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $175k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
3
18
4
19
8
20
5
21
4
22
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$532kHuman Services$255kPhilanthropy$190kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kArts & Culture$23kEducation$19kYouth Development$15kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100,000
FOREBATTEN FOUNDATION$32,000
FIRST THINGS FIRST FOUNDATION$25,000
THE NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$10,000
SPEAK UP STAND UP SAVE A LIFE$5,000
ASU FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEW LIFE CENTER: $60k → 11%NEW LIFE CENTER: $50k → 11%NEW LIFE CENTER: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
NY
IA
OH
MO
VA
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$896k · 12 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$896k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+20%

Still filing today

58%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +33%
  • New Life Center
    3× · 2018–2020 · $140k · revenue +47%
  • AC
    Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $110k · revenue +952%

Funded once

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • FD
    FUND DUEL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • TH
    TREASURE HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

4
Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Foundation

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

Health
5
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Science Foundation Arizona

Science foundation arizona's mission is to diversify arizona's economy by investing in scientific and engineering research linked to industry needs and investing in education to create a work force with 21st centrury skills.

Philanthropy
8
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
9
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce

Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.

10
Aclu Foundation of Arizona

The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.

Civil Rights
11
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Foothills Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $122,469 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST THINGS FIRST FOUNDA — $65,000 · OtherFIRST THINGS FIRST FOUNDAFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE — $52,500 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLEFIRST THINGS FIRST FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherFIRST THINGS FIRST FOUNDATIONBEST BUDDIES — $32,573 · OtherBEST BUDDIES+9 more — $58,500 · Other+9 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associatio…FORE BATTEN FOUNDATION — $37,000 · HealthFORE BATTEN FOUNDATION+2 more — $10,000 · HealthNew Life Center — $140,000 · Human ServicesNew Life Cente…ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $120,141 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMU…THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MINNEAPOL…Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc — $110,000 · Public BenefitArizona Can…UNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $75,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATER WORKS INC — $7,500 · Arts & CultureWHAM ART ASSOCIATION — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$381,042Health$247,000Human Services$140,000Philanthropy$135,141Public Benefit$110,000Public Safety & Disaster$75,000Arts & Culture$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Life Center — $140,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $120,141 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArizona Cancer Foundation for Children Inc — $110,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetUNITED PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INC — $75,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetFORE BATTEN FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREASURE HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDREAM BIG FORE MT YOUTH — $10,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATER WORKS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHAM ART ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSPEAK UP STAND UP SAVE A LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetArizona Humane Society — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · Tw Lewis Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Thunderbirds Charities · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Those Without a Voic funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation for Those Without a Voic?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation for Those Without a Voic through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph