Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for the Mid South Inc

The foundation for the mid south invests in people and strategies that build philanthropy and promote racial, social and economic equity in arkansas, louisiana and mississippi.

$427k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$955kEmployment$608kCommunity Improvement$563kPublic Benefit$435kCivil Rights$238kHuman Services$80kYouth Development$60kCrime & Legal$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $408,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $426,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSISSIPPI ENGAGED$200,000
ONE VOICE INC$25,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS$25,000
INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MINORITY HEALTH$25,000
TOUGALOO COLLEGE$18,000
ONE VOICE INC (MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS$15,000
HIGHLANDER RESEARCH$15,000
ONE VOICE (MISSISSIPPI STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP)$10,000
SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES$10,000
MISSISSIPPI BLACK WOMEN'S ROUNDTABLE$10,000
MISSISSIPPI BLACK WOMEN'S ROUNDTABLE$10,000
MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY FINANCIAL ACCESS COALITION$10,000
MISSISSIPPI BLACK WOMEN'S ROUNDTABLE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOORE COMMUNITY HOUSE - WOMEN IN CONSTRUCTION OF BILOXI: $15k → 19%CompuRecycling Inc: $10k → 27%MISSISSIPPI URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 23%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $18k → 23%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $10k → 23%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $10k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 22 repeat orgs$847k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
30

Total granted

$2.2M
$564k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+3%

Still filing today

86%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $195k · revenue +32%
  • BL
    BOSS LADY ECONOMIC PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT WORKFORCE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $166k · revenue +64% · 52% of their budget
  • SD
    SOUTH DELTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $122k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MV
    MISSISSIPPI VOTES
    one grant, 2023 · $90k · revenue -36%
  • MU
    MISSISSIPPI URBAN LEAGUE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC
    one grant, 2020 · $32k · revenue -59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mississippi County Arkansas Economic Opportunity Commission Inc

Provide support, education and training for Low-Income indivuduals to help become self-sufficient and lead lives of dignity

—
2
Center for Mississippi Healthpolicy
Health
3
North Missindustrial Development a

Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth.

—
4
Working Together Mississippi

Seeking to build relationships with diverse institutions around the state to build the power to effect political change in a non-partisan way while strengthening the institutions we engage with to help execute their institution's mission…

Education
5
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
6
Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College Foundation Inc

The foundation's purpose is to promote, encourage, and assist in all forms of education and research in the MS gulf coast community college's districts, campuses, and activities.

Education
7
Jackson State University Development Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to the JSU academic programs, student scholarships as well as general university support.

Education
8
Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting Inc

MCIR is an independent nonprofit news organization, tasked with educating and informing the people of Mississippi with in-depth, fact-based, nonpartisan information. MCIR focuses on institutionalized injustice and generational poverty.

Arts & Culture
9
Jackson County Economic Development Foundation Inc

Improving the economic development opportunities of jackson county, mississippi by unifying planning, economic & industrial development, and marketing activities in the county.

Community Improvement
10
East Mississippi Development Corporation Meridian Community College
—
11
Jobs for Mississippi Graduates Inc

Jmg's mission is to keep young people in school through graduation and provide work-based learning experiences that will lead to career advancement opportunities or to enroll in a postsecondary institution that leads to a rewarding career.

—
12
Empower Mississippi

We remove barriers to opportunity through citizen action so all mississippians can flourish.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Engaged and the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%5%<5yr14%18%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%2%<5yr14%34%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr14%6%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/56
the rest of the field
15%
1,859/12,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
27/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETTER SCHOOLS BETTER JOBS — $674,775 · OtherBETTER SCHOOLS BETTER JOBSSOUTH DELTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — $122,000 · OtherSOUTH DELTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTHOLMES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 · OtherHINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $57,000 · OtherCOPIAH-LINCOLN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · OtherCENTER FOR SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $65,000 · Other+25 more — $497,995 · Other+25 moreMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED — $200,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI ENGAGEDMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $195,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON B…THE ALLUVIAL COLLECTIVE — $147,289 · Civil RightsTHE ALLUVIAL COLLECTIVEMISSISSIPPI VOTES — $90,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI VOTESMEDGAR AND MYRLIE EVERS INSTITUTE — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $38,000 · Civil Rights+2 morePEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMEN — $75,000 · EducationMISSISSIPPI COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $47,581 · EducationNOVA Workforce Institute of Northeast Louisiana In — $20,000 · EducationTougaloo College — $18,000 · EducationMillsaps College — $18,000 · EducationMID-SOUTH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationBOSS LADY ECONOMIC PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT WORKFORCE — $166,400 · EmploymentMISSISSIPPI DELTA COUNCIL F0R WORKERS OPPORTUNITIES INC — $20,000 · EmploymentOne Voice — $150,000 · Public BenefitMISSISSIPPI URBAN LEAGUE — $50,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES — $37,500 · Human ServicesCompuRecycling Center Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesMOORE COMMUNITY HOUSE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesMISSISSIPPI ENERGY INSTITUTE — $50,000 · Community ImprovementHigher Purpose Hub — $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE REACHING EDUCATING FOR COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementMISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY FINANCIAL ACCESS COALITION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEAST ARKANSAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC — $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,536,770Civil Rights$695,289Education$194,581Employment$186,400Public Benefit$150,000Human Services$132,500Community Improvement$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETTER SCHOOLS BETTER JOBS — $674,775 over 2y, 100% of budgetMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED — $200,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $195,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetBOSS LADY ECONOMIC PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT WORKFORCE — $166,400 over 3y, 52% of budgetOne Voice — $150,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE ALLUVIAL COLLECTIVE — $147,289 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetSOUTH DELTA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT — $122,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VOTES — $90,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMEN — $75,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetHOLMES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $65,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $57,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCOPIAH-LINCOLN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMISSISSIPPI ENERGY INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetMISSISSIPPI URBAN LEAGUE — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $47,581 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetJONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $46,091 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetInstitute for the Advancement of Minority Health — $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMississippi Action For Community Education Inc — $40,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES — $37,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC — $31,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDGAR AND MYRLIE EVERS INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNOVA Workforce Institute of Northeast Louisiana In — $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHigher Purpose Hub — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE REACHING EDUCATING FOR COMMUNITY HOPE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTougaloo College — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNeshoba Youth Coalition Leadership Program — $18,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetMISSION MISSISSIPPI — $18,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMillsaps College — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID-SOUTH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMOORE COMMUNITY HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHEAST ARKANSAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJACKSON MEDICAL MALL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIAJE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST MARY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWarren-Washington-Issaquena-Sharkey Community Action Agency — $8,199 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJackson MS Chapter of The Links Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR RANKIN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WK Kellogg FoundationCommunity Foundation …Mississippi Power Fou…Amalgamated Charitabl…Mississippi Community…Jessie Smith Noyes Fo…Southern Poverty Law …NEO Philanthropy IncBvm Capacity Building…Rsf Social Finance Inc2nd Chance MsThe David and Lucile …
WK Kellogg FoundationMI31.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Mississippi Community College Foundation · Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation · Southern Poverty Law Center Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · 2nd Chance Ms · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for the Mid South Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Foundation for the Mid South Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Foundation for the Mid South Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines