Skip to content

· Public charity

Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education

Address outdoor issues and property rights, research, scholarship programs.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$120kRecreation & Sports$15k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$7,500
FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$5,000
THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY$5,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$5,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY$5,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$5,000
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $5k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $3k → 10%ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $5k → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $5k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $5k → 7%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 29%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
VA
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Educationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 3 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$35k
$50k

Still filing today

0%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5k

Funded once

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    University of Indianapolis
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
2
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
3
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon University: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $5,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherTHE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $5,000 · OtherSt Mary's University: $5,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $5,000 · OtherEDINBURGH BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $5,000 · OtherUniversity of Indianapolis: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Indian…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …Cornell University: $5,000 · EducationCornell UniversityCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $5,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY…Fordham University: $5,000 · EducationFordham UniversityBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$105,000Education$25,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Indianapolis ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's University ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph