Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education

Address outdoor issues and property rights, research, scholarship programs.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of FOUNDATION FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING RESEARCH AND EDUCATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$7,500
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$5,000
ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY$5,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$5,000
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$5,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$5,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$5,000
FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%FASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 17%FORDHAM UNIVERSITY: $5k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $3k → 10%ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $5k → 10%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS: $5k → 16%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $5k → 7%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 29%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
UT
VA
MD
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Educationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 3 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$35k
$50k

Still filing today

0%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN
    2× · 2021–2024 · $5k

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Indianapolis
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
2
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
3
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
4
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
10
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUKE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherSt Mary's University — $5,000 · OtherCarnegie Mellon University — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN — $5,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherTHE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY — $5,000 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $5,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON — $5,000 · OtherEDINBURGH BUSINESS SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGE — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND — $5,000 · OtherUniversity of Indianapolis — $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Indian…University of Notre Dame du Lac — $5,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre …Cornell University — $5,000 · EducationCornell UniversityFordham University — $5,000 · EducationFordham UniversityCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE — $5,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY…BROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$105,000Education$25,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Indianapolis — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Indianapolis
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds St Mary's University
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Fordham University
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Outdoor Advertising Research and Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph