Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation for Intelligent Life on Earth

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$333kReligion$82kFood & Nutrition$13kRecreation & Sports$6kEducation$5kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$2kScience & Tech$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $106k
$262
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$40,000
MA Institute of Technology$30,000
Luskin Center for Innovation$20,000
Aldersgate United Methodist Church$16,000
Issaquah Alps Trails Club$6,000
Missouri River Bird Observatory$1,000
LA LGBT Center$268
Northwest Harvest$262
Yellowstone Forever$262
KCTS$120
Wikimedia Foundation$120
KUOW$120
KING$120
KUSC$120
SETI Institute$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA of Greater Seattle: $50 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 14 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$193k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

57%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $640 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Science & TechEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IA
    Issaquah Alps Trails Club
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +23%
  • SI
    SETI INSTITUTE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $600 · revenue +6%
  • CP
    CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $600 · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • FR
    FUMC Redondo Beach Shared Bread
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FU
    First UMC Redondo Bch Shared Bread
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • BC
    BEACH CITIES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $125 · revenue +164%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
2
Friends of Kexp

Kexp's mission is to enrich your life by championing music and discovery.

Youth Development
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
7
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
8
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
11
Society of Photo Optical Instrumentation Engineers

SPIE is an international nonprofit technical society dedicated to advancing scientific research and engineering applications of optical, photonic, imaging and optoelectronic technologies through its meetings, education programs and…

—
12
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beach Cities Symphony Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $245,200 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $82,150 · OtherALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMA Institute of Technology: $50,025 · OtherMA Institute of TechnologyLuskin Center for Innovation: $38,000 · OtherLuskin Center for Innovation+11 more: $21,970 · OtherMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $4,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $520 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationMISSOURI RIVER BIRD OBSERVATORY: $2,000 · AnimalsCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $600 · Arts & CultureKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $600 · Arts & CultureSETI INSTITUTE: $600 · Science & TechMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $520 · Science & TechSOFTWARE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST INC: $62 · Science & TechYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $262 · EnvironmentCharity Navigator: $60 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $50 · Human Services
Other$437,345Education$4,620Animals$2,000Arts & Culture$1,200Science & Tech$1,182Environment$262Human Services$110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $245,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $10,262 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIssaquah Alps Trails Club: $6,300 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI RIVER BIRD OBSERVATORY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSETI INSTITUTE: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $520 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $520 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAMP MUSIC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Education: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOFTWARE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST INC: $62 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds Issaquah Alps Trails Club ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI RIVER BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds SETI INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOZILLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds BEACH CITIES SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KAMP MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds SOFTWARE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Intelligent Life on Earth funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Intelligent Life on Earth. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Intelligent Life on Earth’s filings →

More from the funding graph