Skip to content
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics at a glance

· Public charity

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics

Find is an international non-profit organization that enables the development and delivery of much-needed diagnostic tests for poverty-related diseases.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$506k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$20MScience & Tech$14MInternational$5.2MEducation$2.0MCommunity Improvement$264kEnvironment$241kAnimals$157kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,411,110, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,782,246 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,371,136 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$40,570
Median grant
7
States reached
$51M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$506,168
DIAGNOSTIC CONSULTING NETWORK$410,848
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc$288,213
American Society of Tropical Med$50,000
QUANTIGEN$40,570
Program appropriate Tech in Health$40,119
DIMAGI INC$30,457
Georgetown University Center for Global Health Practice and Impact$24,922
Drugs & Diagnostics for Tropical Diseases$10,011
HARVARD COLLEGE$9,802
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Sherlock Biosciences Inc: $202k → 8%Boston University: $160k → 16%Biomeme: $4.0M → 22%Vitalant dba Vitalant Research Institute: $261k → 10%Drugs&DiagnosticsforTropicalDiseases: $360k → 11%Scanwell Health: $240k → 14%ZeptoMetrix: $175k → 13%Baylor College of Medicine: $549k → 16%WHO-PAHO: $2.3M → 14%Transnational TechnologiesInc: $5.1M → 13%Llamasoft Inc: $157k → 14%Perkinelmer Health Sciences Inc: $300k → 9%UniversityofNorthCarolina: $644k → 13%Program Appropriate Tech in Health: $313k → 9%MesoScaleDiagnosticsLLC: $142k → 8%Broad Institute: $355k → 8%Biomeme: $685k → 22%Drugs & Diagnostics for Tropical Diseases: $280k → 11%WHO-PAHO: $850k → 14%Transnational TechnologiesInc: $3.2M → 13%University of North Carolina: $527k → 13%Audere: $148k → 9%BroadInstitute: $190k → 8%Boston University: $655k → 16%ColumbiaUniversity: $792k → 17%Georgetown University: $400k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $506k → 13%Program Appropriate Tech in Health: $207k → 9%DiagnosticConsultingNetworkInc: $4.0M → 11%International Rescue Committee Inc: $224k → 17%Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation: $794k → 14%Diagnostic Consulting Network Inc: $2.6M → 11%Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation: $207k → 14%TheCenterforAffordableHealth: $200k → 8%Diagnostic Consulting Network Inc: $1.0M → 11%WolfGreenfieldandSacksPC: $211k → 16%DiagnosticConsultingNetworkInc: $854k → 11%ManagementSciencesforHealth: $621k → 8%DIAGNOSTIC CONSULTING NETWORK: $411k → 11%DimagiInc: $328k → 8%The Regents of the University of California San Diego School of Medicine: $339k → 11%DimagiInc: $252k → 8%CHAI-ClintonHealthAccessInitiationInc: $2.0M → 16%RegentsoftheUniversity of CA San Diego: $193k → 11%Dimagi Inc: $243k → 8%CHAI -Clinton Health Access Initiation Inc: $724k → 16%Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc: $288k → 16%CHAI -Clinton Health Access Initiation Inc: $181k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $12M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$5.5M · 47% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$4.6M · 39% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

East Asia and the Pacific$866k · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

South America$533k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

South Asia$204k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

Russia and Neighboring States$55k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

Middle East and North Africa$27k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: DIAGNOSTICS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 29 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
31

Total granted

$39M
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BIOMECHANICS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4.7M · revenue +209%
  • CH
    CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +24%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $898k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    one grant, 2023 · $549k · revenue +17%
  • PH
    Perkinelmer Health Sciences Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2020 · $284k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DCN DIAGNOSTICS: $8,838,257 · OtherDCN DIAGNOSTICSTransnational TechnologiesInc: $8,301,000 · OtherTransnational TechnologiesIncTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BIOMECHANICS: $4,700,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BIOMECHANICSIndividual grant recipient: $3,126,127 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $1,796,076 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL+39 more: $6,437,124 · Other+39 moreCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $3,289,995 · InternationalCLINTON HEAL…MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $731,154 · InternationalMANAGEMENT S…PATH: $559,614 · InternationalPATHInternational Rescue Committee INC: $224,051 · InternationalELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $1,000,493 · HealthThe Broad Institute Inc: $685,000 · HealthDRUGS & DIAGNOSTICS FOR TROPICAL DISEASE: $678,066 · HealthVitalant: $260,658 · Health+3 more: $153,153 · HealthTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $800,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $548,709 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $424,922 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $81,857 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $67,919 · Education+2 more: $72,808 · EducationMRIGlobal: $25,224 · Science & Tech
Other$33,198,584International$4,804,814Health$2,777,370Education$1,996,215Science & Tech$25,224

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $3,289,995 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $1,000,493 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $898,164 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $800,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $731,154 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $685,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRUGS & DIAGNOSTICS FOR TROPICAL DISEASE: $678,066 over 4y, 58% of budgetPATH: $559,614 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $548,709 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $424,922 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVitalant: $260,658 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $224,051 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUDERE: $196,938 over 2y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH: $90,556 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $82,903 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $81,857 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $67,919 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $47,808 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAG TREATMENT ACTION GROUP INC: $27,951 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMRIGlobal: $25,224 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDIABETES TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY: $20,250 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF BIOMECHANICS ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds DRUGS & DIAGNOSTICS FOR TROPICAL DISEASE ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vitalant ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDERE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationJohns Hopkins Univers…PathJsi Research & Traini…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gates FoundationWA26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Johns Hopkins University · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
  • American Foundation for Biological Research: 27% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics?

Find your warmest path to Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home