Skip to content
Foundation for Education & Health at a glance

· Private foundation

Foundation for Education & Health

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$30kEducation$13kInternational$7kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$4kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,550
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL$4,000
WAMU$2,500
SOS CHILDREN VILLAGES PAKISTAN$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,550
MONTESSORI SCHOOL OF HERNDON PTA$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 74% of grant dollars ($55k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 26% that went abroad ($19k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $1k → 14%HEARTS AND HANDS HOUSE INC: $500 → 20%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $500 → 14%HEARTS AND HANDS HOUSE INC: $500 → 20%HERNDON-RESTON FISH INC: $1k → 6%FAITH: $1k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%CORNER GLEN (CORNERSTONE): $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
NJ
CT
CA
MO
WV
VA
MD
DC
TX

Beyond the US: 26% of all-years giving ($19k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Pakistan$19k · 11 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +173% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
24

Total granted

$50k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+173%
+32%

Still filing today

15%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalReligionArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IK
    IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +173%
  • GH
    GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3k

Funded once

  • CI
    CORNERSTONES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +38%
  • FD
    FAZAL DIN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • MK
    MIRIAM'S KITCHENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
2
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
5
Washington Hospital Center Corporation

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, medstar washington hospital center's (mwhc) mission is to deliver exceptional patient-first health care and an exceptional patient experience. mwhc is renowned for handling the region's…

Health
6
Medstar Health Visiting Nurse Association Inc

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, the medstar visiting nurse association provides personalized home health care for homebound patients in maryland, northern virginia, and the district of columbia. its mission is to make a…

—
7
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
8
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
9
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
12
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstones Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $23,400 · OtherIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INCGOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL: $7,983 · OtherGOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherSOS CHILDREN VILLAGES PAKISTAN: $2,750 · OtherWAMU: $2,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,325 · Other+20 more: $19,775 · Other+20 moreCORNERSTONES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTON…MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $1,500 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S K…Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $1,000 · Human ServicesFoundation…Herndon-Reston FISH Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesHerndon-Re…HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHEART AND …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalOBAT HELPERS INC: $805 · InternationalVassar Brothers Medical Center: $500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 · HealthADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,000 · ReligionALL NEIGHBORS: $250 · ReligionSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $600 · EducationGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SERVICES: $150 · Public Benefit
Other$61,933Human Services$7,000International$1,805Health$1,500Religion$1,250Education$600Arts & Culture$500Public Benefit$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC: $23,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFoundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHerndon-Reston FISH Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOBAT HELPERS INC: $805 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL NEIGHBORS: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SERVICES: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Appropriate and Immediate Temporary ↗
  • Who funds Herndon-Reston FISH Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OBAT HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Vassar Brothers Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL NEIGHBORS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Education & Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Education & Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Education & Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home